Difference between revisions of "Proposals of Changes to the Mathematical Language Specification"

From Event-B
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
* Matthias: The Paragraph "Arithmetic Operators" on page 19 says that "the exponentiation operator has the least priority". That would mean 1+1^2 is parsed as (1+1)^2 and evaluates to 4, which is not the case in Rodin. Giving the exponentiation operator least priority is also uncommon. I therefore propose to change the paragraph to say that the exponentiation operator has highest priority among all arithmetic operators.
 
* Matthias: The Paragraph "Arithmetic Operators" on page 19 says that "the exponentiation operator has the least priority". That would mean 1+1^2 is parsed as (1+1)^2 and evaluates to 4, which is not the case in Rodin. Giving the exponentiation operator least priority is also uncommon. I therefore propose to change the paragraph to say that the exponentiation operator has highest priority among all arithmetic operators.
 +
 +
[[Category:Design proposal]]

Latest revision as of 13:53, 26 March 2010

Change Proposals to Version 1.0

  • Matthias: Section 2.3 says that integer literals are unsigned, i.e., nonnegative. In Arithmetic Rewrite Rules, it is however assumed that integer literals may also be negative. I therefore propose to say in Section 2.3 that integer literals can be positive, zero, or negative, but that negative literals such as -1 are parsed to unary minus followed by 1.
  • Matthias: The Paragraph "Arithmetic Operators" on page 19 says that "the exponentiation operator has the least priority". That would mean 1+1^2 is parsed as (1+1)^2 and evaluates to 4, which is not the case in Rodin. Giving the exponentiation operator least priority is also uncommon. I therefore propose to change the paragraph to say that the exponentiation operator has highest priority among all arithmetic operators.