Search results

From Event-B
Jump to navigationJump to search
  • first two arguments are a start position, third is a direction, result is the end position. ...\operatorname{member}(x,l) \land (\forall y \qdot \operatorname{member}(y,l) \limp y \leq x)</math>
    8 KB (1,199 words) - 13:37, 7 September 2010
  • \end{array} |<math> \begin{array}{l}
    18 KB (2,643 words) - 12:41, 12 August 2009
  • ...'L'' and ''O'' have departed (A standing for ancestor). We also consider ''L'' and ''O'' as being symmetrical (and thus we won't describe symmetrical sc ...tory'' as the union of ''proof histories'' from ''O'' and ''L' plus, say ''L'' ''main proof''
    6 KB (1,046 words) - 10:34, 27 October 2011
  • \end{array} \begin{array}{l}
    4 KB (738 words) - 12:53, 12 August 2009
  • ...edness subgoals, thus rendering well-definedness almost transparent to the end-user. ....ac.uk/~hoderk/sine K. Hoder. SUMO infernce engine.]</ref><ref>J. Meng and L. C. Paulson. Lightweight relevance filtering for machine-generated resoluti
    11 KB (1,699 words) - 15:25, 27 January 2011
  • \begin{array}{l} \end{array}
    11 KB (1,869 words) - 23:48, 21 January 2011
  • ...abelle/HOL is the instantiation of the generic theorem prover Isabelle<ref>L. C. Paulson. The foundation of a generic theorem prover. Journal of Automat ...s to several competition winning automated theorem provers such as Z3 <ref>L. M. de Moura and N. Bjørner. Z3: An efficient SMT solver. In TACAS, volume
    21 KB (3,334 words) - 21:20, 20 April 2012
  • * (optionally) some other description of a characteristic, e.g. left (L), right (R). Inference rules applied automatically are applied at the end of each proof step. They have the following possible effects:
    27 KB (4,348 words) - 08:56, 26 September 2011
  • * (optionally) some other description of a characteristic, e.g. left (L), right (R). Inference rules applied automatically are applied at the end of each proof step. They have the following possible effects:
    27 KB (4,348 words) - 18:45, 28 September 2011