Element Hierarchy Extension Point & Library: Difference between revisions

From Event-B
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Tommy
m New page: The UI in Rodin 2.x contains an extension point <tt>org.eventb.ui.editorItems</tt> that contains the both following information: *the definition of elements and attributes and their hierar...
 
imported>Laurent
 
(60 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The UI in Rodin 2.x contains an extension point <tt>org.eventb.ui.editorItems</tt> that contains the both following information:
The UI in Rodin 2.x contains an extension point <tt>org.eventb.ui.editorItems</tt> that groups the both following information:
*the definition of elements and attributes and their hierarchy,
*the definition of elements and attributes and their hierarchy, and the way they are created
*the information needed to correctly display these element in the various editors and UI components.
*the information needed to correctly display and edit these elements in the various editors and UI components


It appears obvious that the first information should be defined from an extension that belongs to the Database, and therefore the extension point should be split in two.
It appears obvious that the first information should be defined from an extension that belongs to the Database.
To fullfil the above statement, the current extension point <tt>org.eventb.ui.editorItems</tt> should be split in two.
The existing extension point was also heterogenous. Indeed, whereas the element relationships were concerning element types, the attribute relationship were concerning element types and references to UI defined attributes (referring to core attributes).<br>
There is no need for such an indirection.
 
----
The proposal should concern :
A - Relationship declaration (new extension point)
B - API to test these relations and traverse them
C - Enforcement of the authorized relations when modifying the DB
D- What about the compatibilty with the file upgrade mechanism?
----
 
= Some identified difficulties =
 
== Correspondence between UI manipulation and "core" elements ==
If some element or attribute relationship is declared at the database level, but there is no corresponding {{ident|editorItem}} for it, it will be ignored by the UI. This is similar to the previous situation where some elements or attributes could be present in the database but not in the user interface hierarchy.


= Behaviour =




= Proposal =
= Proposal =
The proposal should concern :
 
  - Relationship declaration (new extension point)
The part concerning element definition and hierarchy will go to a dedicated extension point in the database.
  - API to test these relations and traverse them
 
- Enforcement of the authorized relations when modifying the DB
=== A - hierarchy definition ===
- Behaviour while loading a file (including a file with invalid parent-child relations occurrences)
 
- What about the compatibilty with the file upgrade mechanism?
Here is the definition of the new extension point : org.rodinp.core.itemRelations which describes the possible children and attributes of internal elements.
 
Configuration Markup:
<!ELEMENT extension (relationship+)>
<!ATTLIST extension
point CDATA #REQUIRED
id    CDATA #IMPLIED
name  CDATA #IMPLIED
>
<!ELEMENT relationship ((childType | attributeType)+)>
<!ATTLIST elementRelationship
parentTypeId CDATA #REQUIRED
>
parentTypeId - Element type of the parent, must be the unique ID of a Rodin internal element type (see extension point org.rodinp.core.internalElementTypes).
<!ELEMENT childType EMPTY>
<!ATTLIST childType
typeId                CDATA #REQUIRED
>
typeId - Element type of the child, must be the unique ID of a Rodin internal element type (see extension point org.rodinp.core.internalElementTypes).
<!ELEMENT attributeType EMPTY>
<!ATTLIST attributeType
typeId CDATA #REQUIRED
>
  attributeTypeId - Id of the Rodin attribute type to which this description applies (see extension point org.rodinp.core.attributeTypes).
   
The use of such extension point is obvious in org.eventb.core plug-in, as it would complement the extensions of org.rodinp.core.attributeTypes and org.rodinp.core.internalElementTypes.
 
=== B - API to declare and test the element/attribute relations and traverse them ===
 
The API of the Rodin database is extended as follows:
 
* interface IInternalElementType is extended with methods
 
  IInternalElementType<?>[] getParentTypes();
  IInternalElementType<?>[] getChildTypes();
  IAttributeType[] getAttributeTypes();
 
  boolean canParent(IInternalElementType<?> childType);
  boolean canCarry(IAttributeType attrType);
 
* interface IAttributeType is extended with methods
 
  IInternalElementType<?>[] getElementTypes();
 
  boolean isAttributeOf(IInternalElementType<?> elementType);
 
This list might be later extended with new methods such as
{{ident|isAncestorOf}} if this proves useful.
 
=== D - Compatibility with the upgrade mechanism ===
 
Things start with the org.rodinp.core.conversion extension point.<br>
The modifications are done in XPATH  there is no incompatibility introduced here.
 
== UI related information ==
The part concerning how to display elements and UI related info will stay in the editorItems extension point and shall point to an element definition and hierachy.<br>
Relationships will disappear from the editorItems extension point.
 


[[Category:Design_proposal]]
[[Category:Design_proposal]]

Latest revision as of 13:17, 12 October 2012

The UI in Rodin 2.x contains an extension point org.eventb.ui.editorItems that groups the both following information:

  • the definition of elements and attributes and their hierarchy, and the way they are created
  • the information needed to correctly display and edit these elements in the various editors and UI components

It appears obvious that the first information should be defined from an extension that belongs to the Database. To fullfil the above statement, the current extension point org.eventb.ui.editorItems should be split in two. The existing extension point was also heterogenous. Indeed, whereas the element relationships were concerning element types, the attribute relationship were concerning element types and references to UI defined attributes (referring to core attributes).
There is no need for such an indirection.


The proposal should concern :

A - Relationship declaration (new extension point)
B - API to test these relations and traverse them
C - Enforcement of the authorized relations when modifying the DB
D- What about the compatibilty with the file upgrade mechanism?

Some identified difficulties

Correspondence between UI manipulation and "core" elements

If some element or attribute relationship is declared at the database level, but there is no corresponding

editorItem

for it, it will be ignored by the UI. This is similar to the previous situation where some elements or attributes could be present in the database but not in the user interface hierarchy.


Proposal

The part concerning element definition and hierarchy will go to a dedicated extension point in the database.

A - hierarchy definition

Here is the definition of the new extension point : org.rodinp.core.itemRelations which describes the possible children and attributes of internal elements.

Configuration Markup:
<!ELEMENT extension (relationship+)>
<!ATTLIST extension
point CDATA #REQUIRED
id    CDATA #IMPLIED
name  CDATA #IMPLIED
>

<!ELEMENT relationship ((childType | attributeType)+)>
<!ATTLIST elementRelationship
parentTypeId CDATA #REQUIRED
>
parentTypeId - Element type of the parent, must be the unique ID of a Rodin internal element type (see extension point org.rodinp.core.internalElementTypes).

<!ELEMENT childType EMPTY>
<!ATTLIST childType
typeId                CDATA #REQUIRED
>
typeId - Element type of the child, must be the unique ID of a Rodin internal element type (see extension point org.rodinp.core.internalElementTypes).

<!ELEMENT attributeType EMPTY>
<!ATTLIST attributeType
typeId CDATA #REQUIRED
>
attributeTypeId - Id of the Rodin attribute type to which this description applies (see extension point org.rodinp.core.attributeTypes).

The use of such extension point is obvious in org.eventb.core plug-in, as it would complement the extensions of org.rodinp.core.attributeTypes and org.rodinp.core.internalElementTypes.

B - API to declare and test the element/attribute relations and traverse them

The API of the Rodin database is extended as follows:

  • interface IInternalElementType is extended with methods
 IInternalElementType<?>[] getParentTypes();
 IInternalElementType<?>[] getChildTypes();
 IAttributeType[] getAttributeTypes();
 boolean canParent(IInternalElementType<?> childType);
 boolean canCarry(IAttributeType attrType);
  • interface IAttributeType is extended with methods
 IInternalElementType<?>[] getElementTypes();
 boolean isAttributeOf(IInternalElementType<?> elementType);

This list might be later extended with new methods such as

isAncestorOf

if this proves useful.

D - Compatibility with the upgrade mechanism

Things start with the org.rodinp.core.conversion extension point.
The modifications are done in XPATH there is no incompatibility introduced here.

UI related information

The part concerning how to display elements and UI related info will stay in the editorItems extension point and shall point to an element definition and hierachy.
Relationships will disappear from the editorItems extension point.