Difference between revisions of "Proposals of Changes to the Mathematical Language Specification"
From Event-B
Jump to navigationJump to searchimported>Wohuai (New page: =Change Proposals to Version 1.0= * Matthias: Section 2.3 says that integer literals are unsigned, i.e., nonnegative. In Arithmetic Rewrite Rules, it is assumed that integer literals ...) |
imported>Wohuai m |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Change Proposals to Version 1.0= | =Change Proposals to Version 1.0= | ||
− | * Matthias: Section 2.3 says that integer literals are unsigned, i.e., nonnegative. In [[Arithmetic Rewrite Rules]], it is assumed that integer literals may also be negative. I therefore propose to say in Section 2.3 that integer literals can be positive, zero, or negative, but that negative literals such as -1 are parsed to unary minus followed by 1. | + | * Matthias: Section 2.3 says that integer literals are unsigned, i.e., nonnegative. In [[Arithmetic Rewrite Rules]], it is however assumed that integer literals may also be negative. I therefore propose to say in Section 2.3 that integer literals can be positive, zero, or negative, but that negative literals such as -1 are parsed to unary minus followed by 1. |
Revision as of 09:27, 11 January 2010
Change Proposals to Version 1.0
- Matthias: Section 2.3 says that integer literals are unsigned, i.e., nonnegative. In Arithmetic Rewrite Rules, it is however assumed that integer literals may also be negative. I therefore propose to say in Section 2.3 that integer literals can be positive, zero, or negative, but that negative literals such as -1 are parsed to unary minus followed by 1.