ADVANCE D3.2 General Platform Maintenance: Difference between revisions
imported>Tommy |
imported>Laurent |
||
(87 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This part concerns the general maintenance performed on the Rodin toolset within the first ten months of the ADVANCE project. As the maintenance is a task that concerns the whole toolset, and to ease the reading of this part of the deliverable, the maintenance section has been decomposed in a list of subsections corresponding to scopes of the toolset. These sections are: core Rodin platform, UML-B improvements, code generation, ProR and Camille. All these subsections maintain the template previously defined in the introduction. | |||
=== Overview | = Core Rodin platform = | ||
== Overview == | |||
The Rodin platform versions concerned by this deliverable are: | The Rodin platform versions concerned by this deliverable are: | ||
* 2.4 (released on 31.01.2012), | * 2.4 (released on 31.01.2012), | ||
Line 7: | Line 9: | ||
* 2.6 (released on 31.07.2012). | * 2.6 (released on 31.07.2012). | ||
The core Rodin | The core Rodin platform maintenance task focused on fixing the identified bugs and mitigating usability issues. During DEPLOY, many features and contributions were added to the toolset as users wishes and requests were collected along. At the same time, the Event-B models and proof got bigger and bigger, in the same way as the experience of the users involved constantly increased ergo the size of the systems they modelled. Scalability issues occured at some point when feature addition was favoured to design refactorings. As the DEPLOY project was nearing its end, it appeared mandatory for the development team, to address the specific bugs and issues reported by the DEPLOY partners and related to scalability or usability, and wished resolved by the end of the project. The various tasks to be performed were scheduled, prioritized and regularly updated during bi-weekly teleconferences. | ||
The following paragraphs will give an overview of the the work that has been performed concerning maintenance on the existing platform components (i.e. core platform and plug-ins). | The following paragraphs will give an overview of the the work that has been performed concerning maintenance on the existing platform components (i.e. core platform and plug-ins). | ||
Release Notes<ref name="relNotes">http://wiki.event-b.org/index.php/Rodin_Platform_Releases</ref> and the SourceForge trackers<ref>http://sourceforge.net/projects/rodin-b-sharp/</ref> (bugs and feature requests) are available for more details about the previous and upcoming releases of the Rodin platform. | Release Notes<ref name="relNotes">http://wiki.event-b.org/index.php/Rodin_Platform_Releases</ref> and the SourceForge trackers<ref>http://sourceforge.net/projects/rodin-b-sharp/</ref> (bugs and feature requests) are available for more details about the previous and upcoming releases of the Rodin platform. | ||
== Motivations / Decisions == | |||
'''Provide 64-bit versions of the Rodin platform on Linux and Windows systems'''<br> | '''Provide 64-bit versions of the Rodin platform on Linux and Windows systems'''<br> | ||
End users asked the Rodin team to provide 32-bit and 64-bit versions of the Rodin platform for Linux and Windows operating systems. Before Rodin 2.4, the only 64-bit version of Rodin was available on Mac platforms as 32-bit Mac (early 2006) platforms are no longer maintained by Apple. The motivation that would push forward 64-bit | End users asked the Rodin team to provide 32-bit and 64-bit versions of the Rodin platform for Linux and Windows operating systems. Before Rodin 2.4, the only 64-bit version of Rodin was available on Mac platforms as 32-bit Mac (early 2006) platforms are no longer maintained by Apple. The motivation that would push forward 64-bit architectures is the possibility to increase the available java heap size which is, for example, extensively used during the automated proof. After a phase of testing and despite the drawbacks of assembling and maintaining five platforms instead of three, Linux and Windows 64-bit as well as 32-bit platforms are now systematically made available since the Rodin 2.4 release. | ||
'''The Rodin Editor | '''The Rodin Editor in the Rodin core platform'''<br> | ||
According to | According to its role in the Rodin toolset, and its stabilization, the Rodin Editor,<ref>http://wiki.event-b.org/index.php/Rodin_Editor</ref> has been integrated into the core platform since Rodin release 2.4. | ||
== Available Documentation == | |||
The release notes, that appear and are maintained on the wiki, and that accompany each release, give useful information about the Rodin platforms. Moreover, two web trackers list and detail the known bugs and open feature requests: | |||
* a sourceforge bug tracker,<ref>http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=108850&atid=651669</ref> | |||
* a sourceforge feature requests tracker.<ref>http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=108850&atid=651672</ref> | |||
The Event-B wiki,<ref name="rodinWiki">http://wiki.event-b.org/</ref> basic source of documentation for the users and developers of the Rodin toolset, was completed by the Rodin handbook, an ultimate source of documentation which reached completion by the end of the DEPLOY project. The handbook aimed to overcome the lack of a centralized source of information providing the necessary assistance to an engineer in the need to be productive using Event-B and minimize the access to an expert user. It is continuously maintained by the various actors involved in the environment of the Rodin toolset and is available as a PDF version, a HTML version, and help contents within Rodin. Both the Rodin handbook and the Event-B wiki represent the main source of documentation about Event-B and the Rodin toolset. | |||
Finally, a channel has been created on Youtube, in order to provide video tutorials about the use of the platform.<ref>http://www.youtube.com/user/EventBTv</ref> | |||
== Planning == | |||
Two releases of the core platform have been scheduled after Rodin 2.6 has been published: Rodin 2.7 (end of October 2012) followed by Rodin 3.0 (end of January 2013). Rodin 2.7 will mainly be a corrective release. However, it will integrate the Theory plug-in (which allows to define mathematical extensions and is currently provided as a separate plug-in). | |||
Work on release 3.0 will start concurrently with development of Rodin 2.7 and will include lots of refactoring and evolutions in the published programming interface (API). A non exhaustive list of the planned improvements and refactoring is: | |||
*Binders will be allowed in extensions. | |||
*The platform will be based on Eclipse 4. | |||
*The AST will be made stronger. | |||
*The sequent prover will be enhanced. | |||
*Parent-child element relationship extension points will be moved from the UI plug-in to the EventB core plug-in. | |||
*The Event-B keyboard plug-in will be refactored to separate the UI code from the ASCII/Math translation mechanism. | |||
*The statistics view will be refactored to handle other kinds of component files (currently just Contexts and Machines are supported). | |||
= | = UML-B Improvements = | ||
== Overview == | |||
The UML-B plug-in and associated frameworks are developed and maintained by Dr Colin Snook at the University of Southampton. Significant contributions (to the latest version) have been made by Vitaly Savicks (state-machines) and Gintautas Sulskus (Class Diagrams). The UML-B plugin provides UML-like diagrammatic modelling as an extension to Event-B and the Rodin platform. UML-B is an established plug-in which will be developed and improved to support the aims of the ADVANCE project. UML-B was redeveloped during the DEPLOY project to provide closer integration with Event-B. A state-machine diagram editor is already released in this integrated version and a class diagram editor is now being developed as a prototype. | |||
[[Image:Umlb_cap2.jpg|center|A UML-B state machine and its Event-B counterpart]] | |||
Other improvements will include new diagrammatic notations which are directly related to the aims of ADVANCE, such as component diagrams, as well as more general improvements, such as usability, and any features required by the projects industrial partners. | |||
== Motivations / Decisions == | |||
The implementation of the UML-B tool is structured to provide re-usable features as much as possible. To achieve this, wherever possible, generic frameworks are developed and the implementation of specific diagram tools is minimised by utilising these frameworks. The following frameworks are now in use by UML-B and available as a basis for future diagrammatic modelling notations. | The implementation of the UML-B tool is structured to provide re-usable features as much as possible. To achieve this, wherever possible, generic frameworks are developed and the implementation of specific diagram tools is minimised by utilising these frameworks. The following frameworks are now in use by UML-B and available as a basis for future diagrammatic modelling notations. | ||
* The Event-B EMF framework provides an EMF basis for Event-B models (developed during the | * The ''Event-B EMF framework'' provides an EMF basis for Event-B models (developed during the DEPLOY project). Indeed, it provides an EMF representation of Event-B models with persistence into the Rodin database. | ||
* The ''Event-B EMF Support for Modelling Extensions framework'' provides support for extending Event-B with new modelling features (initially developed during the DEPLOY project and now being extended in the ADVANCE project). It provides Navigator support for EMF-only model elements, a persistence mechanism for model extensions that are not needed to be processed by Rodin and a Generic Refiner for modelling extensions (which has recently been added). | |||
* The Event-B EMF Support for Modelling Extensions framework provides support for extending Event-B with new modelling features (initially developed during the | * ''The Event-B GMF Diagrams Generic Support framework'' provides support for developing new diagram notations (started in the DEPLOY project but mostly developed during the ADVANCE project). It provides generic support for diagrammatic aspects of modelling extensions, and a generic validation and Event-B generation service (which has recently been added). | ||
* The Event-B GMF Diagrams Generic Support framework provides support for developing new diagram notations (started in the | |||
A new release of the | A new release of the state-machine diagram editor has been made. This release corrected some problems and improved use of the generic framework features. | ||
Work is in progress on a new version of the UML-B Class Diagram editor. This takes the same approach as the state-machines editor in that the models are contained within machines (and, in this case, also contexts) and that diagrammatic model features link to and enhance existing Event-B elements rather than generate everything. The Class diagram editor is currently a prototype and has not been released. | |||
== Available Documentation == | |||
http:// | A paper exists about the framework for diagrammatic modelling extension in Rodin: | ||
Savicks, Vitaly, Snook, Colin (2012) ''A Framework for Diagrammatic Modelling Extensions in Rodin'' in Rodin User & Developer Workshop 2012 Proceedings. Newcastle University. (Unpublished) <ref>http://deploy-eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/382/</ref> | |||
Wiki pages are available for developers using the Generic extensions and Diagrams frameworks:<br> | |||
http://wiki.event-b.org/index.php/EMF_framework_for_Event-B<br> | |||
http://wiki.event-b.org/index.php/Generic_Event-B_EMF_extensions (Under Construction) | http://wiki.event-b.org/index.php/Generic_Event-B_EMF_extensions (Under Construction) | ||
A paper exists about the Event-B state-machines: | |||
Savicks, Vitaly, Snook, Colin and Butler, Michael (2009) ''Animation of UML-B State-machines'' in Rodin User & Developer Workshop 2010 Proceedings. Düsseldorf University, 2010.<ref>http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/268261/</ref> | |||
Wiki pages for users of UML-B | Wiki pages are available for users of UML-B, everything starts from http://wiki.event-b.org/index.php/UML-B<ref>http://wiki.event-b.org/index.php/UML-B</ref> | ||
== Planning == | |||
The following work is planned: | The following work is planned: | ||
* Re-base the Event-B EMF framework on the EMF model of the Rodin database (which is now available as a result of the development of a new Rodin editor to replace the form based editor). | * Re-base the Event-B EMF framework on the EMF model of the Rodin database (which is now available as a result of the development of a new Rodin editor to replace the form based editor). | ||
* Re-write the Event-B generator of the | * Re-write the Event-B generator of the state-machine diagram editor so that it uses the generic generator from the Event-B GMF Support for Generic Diagrams framework. This will improve performance. | ||
* Improve the | * Improve the state-machine diagram animation interface so that it supports animation of multiple diagrams. | ||
* Complete the development of the new version of the UML-B Class Diagram editor. | * Complete the development of the new version of the UML-B Class Diagram editor. | ||
* Develop Animation interface for the Class diagram editor. | * Develop Animation interface for the Class diagram editor. | ||
* Develop a Component diagram editor and associated simulation tools. | * Develop a Component diagram editor and associated simulation tools. | ||
= Code generation = | |||
== | == Overview == | ||
The code generation feature provides the support for the generation of code from refined Event-B models. The development of the approach, and the tools to support it, involved a number of team members at Southampton. To this end a multi-tasking approach, which is conceptually similar to that of the Ada tasking model, was designed. Tasks are modelled by an extension to Event-B, called Tasking Machines which are an extension of the existing Event-B Machine component. | |||
The latest Code Generation feature was released on 30th May 2012. The new features in this release include code generation from state-machine diagrams (see UML-B). | |||
== | == Motivations / Decisions == | ||
State-machines are frequently used to describe the behaviour of embedded systems. It is a relatively new feature in Event-B, and we augment the tool with the ability to generate code from state-machine diagrams in version 0.2.3 of the code generation feature plug-in. Implementation code is generated from the diagram itself, and no additional mark-up of the model is required; that is, nothing over and above the usual mark-up required for Tasking Event-B, such as identifying non-typing/typing invariants, and guards etc. State-machines are created, using the existing state-machine plug-in, subject to the limitations described after. | |||
The current code generation tool is restricted to generating code for a single Event-B machine, which may contain one or more state-machines. We have yet to explore the decomposition/composition of machines containing state-machines. In principal we should be able to apply decomposition techniques to decompose the single Event-B machine with state-machines into a number of machines, with the state-machines, or the elements of state-machines, distributed between them. | |||
Another limitation is that we do not handle nested state-machines, although this should be feasible. | |||
Only the state-machines of tasking/environ machines generate code. State-machines of shared machines do not generate code. This should be explored further during research into decomposition. | |||
The translation of the diagrammatic elements to code has been hard-coded in the code generation plug-in. We have introduced new types to the translator's common language model (IL1). We add case-statements, and a container for them (analogous to switch) since these are commonly used to implement state-machines. The code generator navigates through each state of a state-machine, generating an internal representation of the state-machine, which is used to create the IL1 model. The IL1 model is then used to generate code for the various target languages that may have been implemented. We have also updated the IL1-to-target code generators, to generate case/switch statements in Ada, C and Java. | |||
Each state-machine has an Enumerated type whose elements take the names of the states. A state variable is created in the target that keeps track of the current state, and has the type of the enumeration. | |||
== Available Documentation == | |||
A specific page on the Event-B wiki<ref>http://wiki.event-b.org/index.php/Code_Generation_Activity</ref> is dedicated to Code Generation Updates. | |||
== | == Planning == | ||
Efforts will focus on extending the existing code generation approach, and developing new techniques, for the simulation of cyber-physical systems. | |||
= | = ProR = | ||
== Overview == | |||
The Rodin/ProR integration plugin is developed and maintained by Lukas Ladenberger and Michael Jastram at the University of Duesseldorf. ProR is a tool for working with requirements in natural language. It is part of the Eclipse Requirements Modeling Framework (RMF).<ref>http://www.eclipse.org/rmf/</ref> | |||
The following paragraphs will give an overview of the the work that has been performed concerning maintenance on the Rodin/ProR plugin. | |||
== Motivations / Decisions == | |||
The motivation of the Rodin/ProR integration plugin was to bring two complimentary fields of research, requirements engineering and formal modelling, closer together. Especially, the traceability within a system description is a challenging problem of requirements engineering. In particular, formal models of the system are often based on informal requirements, but creating and maintaining the traceability between the two can be challenging. In <ref name="req1ref">http://www.stups.uni-duesseldorf.de/w/Special:Publication/HalJasLad2012</ref>, we presented an incremental approach for producing a system description from an initial set of requirements. The foundation of the approach is a classification of requirements into artefacts W (domain properties), R (requirements) and S (specification). In addition, the approach uses designated phenomena as the vocabulary employed by the artefacts. The central idea is that adequacy of the system description must be justified, meaning that W ∧ S ⇒ R. The approach establishes a traceability, and the resulting system description may consist of formal and informal artefacts. We created tool support for this approach by integrating Rodin and ProR. We designed it with the goal to support the approach described in <ref name="req1ref"/>, and to ease the integration of natural language requirements and Event-B. | The motivation of the Rodin/ProR integration plugin was to bring two complimentary fields of research, requirements engineering and formal modelling, closer together. Especially, the traceability within a system description is a challenging problem of requirements engineering. In particular, formal models of the system are often based on informal requirements, but creating and maintaining the traceability between the two can be challenging. In ''A Method and Tool for Tracing Requirements into Specifications''<ref name="req1ref">http://www.stups.uni-duesseldorf.de/w/Special:Publication/HalJasLad2012</ref>, we presented an incremental approach for producing a system description from an initial set of requirements. The foundation of the approach is a classification of requirements into artefacts W (domain properties), R (requirements) and S (specification). In addition, the approach uses designated phenomena as the vocabulary employed by the artefacts. The central idea is that adequacy of the system description must be justified, meaning that W ∧ S ⇒ R. The approach establishes a traceability, and the resulting system description may consist of formal and informal artefacts. We created tool support for this approach by integrating Rodin and ProR. We designed it with the goal to support the approach described in <ref name="req1ref"/>, and to ease the integration of natural language requirements and Event-B. | ||
== Available Documentation == | |||
* ''A Method and Tool for Tracing Requirements into Specifications''.<ref name="req1ref"/> The paper has been submitted to Science of Computer Programming. | |||
* ''Requirements Traceability between Textual Requirements and Formal Models Using ProR''.<ref>http://www.stups.uni-duesseldorf.de/w/Special:Publication/LadenbergerJastram_iFMABZ2012</ref> The paper has been accepted for iFM'2012 & ABZ'2012. | |||
* A | * A Tutorial for the Rodin/ProR integration<ref>http://wiki.event-b.org/index.php/ProR</ref> can be found on the Event-B wiki. | ||
* | * The User Guide<ref>http://wiki.eclipse.org/RMF/User_Guide</ref> is available on the Event-B wiki and contains an additional tutorials for ProR. | ||
== Planning == | |||
= | There are still some limitations on the ProR/Rodin integration plugin, however. While all required data structures exist, the plugin would benefit from more sophisticated reporting. In particular, the method mentioned above<ref name="req1ref"/> lists a number of properties of a correct system description. For example, the existence of a trace between an artifact and its used phenomenon, or the fact that domain properties, requirement items and design decisions may only be expressed referring to phenomena that are visible in the environment, whereas design decisions and plaform properties may only be expressed referring to phenomena that are visible to the system. While the presence of such properties does not guarantee correctness, their absence indicates a problem. This is already done, to a degree, through the colour highlighting, but a reporting tool that lists all violations of those properties will be implemented. | ||
Currently, each used artifact is identified as belonging to one of the following class: domain properties, requirement items, specification elements, implementation elements, design decisions or platform properties. This in turn determines the different kinds of phenomena that are allowed to be used by the artefact. For the moment, the plugin does not support such classification by phenomenon types. In a next step, we will work on a concept for classifying and maintaining phenomena with ProR. | |||
= Camille = | |||
== Overview == | |||
The Camille plug-in provides a textual editor for Rodin. | |||
Though such a text editor is prefered by many users, Camille currently has the drawback of not supporting extensibility. | |||
It only supports the core Event-B language and plug-in-specific additions are simply ignored. Such extensions can not be edited through Camille. | |||
Consequently, users have to switch back to Rodin's native Editor to edit plug-in-specific modelling extensions. | |||
This has become a major issue during the last years, since many plug-ins have been developed in the meantime that are widely used by many users. | |||
This issue is currently being adressed by Ingo Weigelt at the University of Duesseldorf. | |||
== | == Motivations / Decisions == | ||
A new version of Camille will be implemented during the ADVANCE project to enable users to edit extended Event-B models solely through a text editor. | |||
To plan the new version, the problem and a number of possible solutions have been analysed and related in a technical report<ref name="Architectures_for_an_Extensible_Text_Editor_for_Rodin">http://www.stups.uni-duesseldorf.de/mediawiki/images/0/0a/Pub-Weigelt2012.pdf</ref> from Ingo Weigelt. | |||
The results of this work have been dicussed in the Rodin community and one of the proposed solution (a blockparser) has been selected to be implemented during the next months. | |||
The dedicated solution promises to provide Camille extensibility with minimal extra workload required from plug-in developers while still being very flexible regarding future, yet unknown, requirements. | |||
=== | == Available Documentation == | ||
= | * ''Architectures for an Extensible Text Editor for Rodin''.<ref name="Architectures_for_an_Extensible_Text_Editor_for_Rodin"/> Bachelor thesis analysing the problem and discussing possible solutions. | ||
* An earlier version of the thesis has been published as a technical report<ref>http://www.stups.uni-duesseldorf.de/w/Special:Publication/Weigelt2012></ref> that has been discussed on the Roding Developers Mailing List and the ADVANCE Progress Meeting in May 2012 in Paris. | |||
== Planning == | |||
The new Camille version will be implemented at the University of Duesseldorf during 2012. The final version is expected in January or February 2013. | |||
= References = | |||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
[[Category:ADVANCE D3.2 Deliverable]] | [[Category:ADVANCE D3.2 Deliverable]] |
Latest revision as of 13:18, 18 July 2012
This part concerns the general maintenance performed on the Rodin toolset within the first ten months of the ADVANCE project. As the maintenance is a task that concerns the whole toolset, and to ease the reading of this part of the deliverable, the maintenance section has been decomposed in a list of subsections corresponding to scopes of the toolset. These sections are: core Rodin platform, UML-B improvements, code generation, ProR and Camille. All these subsections maintain the template previously defined in the introduction.
Core Rodin platform
Overview
The Rodin platform versions concerned by this deliverable are:
- 2.4 (released on 31.01.2012),
- 2.5 (released on 02.05.2012),
- 2.6 (released on 31.07.2012).
The core Rodin platform maintenance task focused on fixing the identified bugs and mitigating usability issues. During DEPLOY, many features and contributions were added to the toolset as users wishes and requests were collected along. At the same time, the Event-B models and proof got bigger and bigger, in the same way as the experience of the users involved constantly increased ergo the size of the systems they modelled. Scalability issues occured at some point when feature addition was favoured to design refactorings. As the DEPLOY project was nearing its end, it appeared mandatory for the development team, to address the specific bugs and issues reported by the DEPLOY partners and related to scalability or usability, and wished resolved by the end of the project. The various tasks to be performed were scheduled, prioritized and regularly updated during bi-weekly teleconferences.
The following paragraphs will give an overview of the the work that has been performed concerning maintenance on the existing platform components (i.e. core platform and plug-ins). Release Notes[1] and the SourceForge trackers[2] (bugs and feature requests) are available for more details about the previous and upcoming releases of the Rodin platform.
Motivations / Decisions
Provide 64-bit versions of the Rodin platform on Linux and Windows systems
End users asked the Rodin team to provide 32-bit and 64-bit versions of the Rodin platform for Linux and Windows operating systems. Before Rodin 2.4, the only 64-bit version of Rodin was available on Mac platforms as 32-bit Mac (early 2006) platforms are no longer maintained by Apple. The motivation that would push forward 64-bit architectures is the possibility to increase the available java heap size which is, for example, extensively used during the automated proof. After a phase of testing and despite the drawbacks of assembling and maintaining five platforms instead of three, Linux and Windows 64-bit as well as 32-bit platforms are now systematically made available since the Rodin 2.4 release.
The Rodin Editor in the Rodin core platform
According to its role in the Rodin toolset, and its stabilization, the Rodin Editor,[3] has been integrated into the core platform since Rodin release 2.4.
Available Documentation
The release notes, that appear and are maintained on the wiki, and that accompany each release, give useful information about the Rodin platforms. Moreover, two web trackers list and detail the known bugs and open feature requests:
The Event-B wiki,[6] basic source of documentation for the users and developers of the Rodin toolset, was completed by the Rodin handbook, an ultimate source of documentation which reached completion by the end of the DEPLOY project. The handbook aimed to overcome the lack of a centralized source of information providing the necessary assistance to an engineer in the need to be productive using Event-B and minimize the access to an expert user. It is continuously maintained by the various actors involved in the environment of the Rodin toolset and is available as a PDF version, a HTML version, and help contents within Rodin. Both the Rodin handbook and the Event-B wiki represent the main source of documentation about Event-B and the Rodin toolset. Finally, a channel has been created on Youtube, in order to provide video tutorials about the use of the platform.[7]
Planning
Two releases of the core platform have been scheduled after Rodin 2.6 has been published: Rodin 2.7 (end of October 2012) followed by Rodin 3.0 (end of January 2013). Rodin 2.7 will mainly be a corrective release. However, it will integrate the Theory plug-in (which allows to define mathematical extensions and is currently provided as a separate plug-in).
Work on release 3.0 will start concurrently with development of Rodin 2.7 and will include lots of refactoring and evolutions in the published programming interface (API). A non exhaustive list of the planned improvements and refactoring is:
- Binders will be allowed in extensions.
- The platform will be based on Eclipse 4.
- The AST will be made stronger.
- The sequent prover will be enhanced.
- Parent-child element relationship extension points will be moved from the UI plug-in to the EventB core plug-in.
- The Event-B keyboard plug-in will be refactored to separate the UI code from the ASCII/Math translation mechanism.
- The statistics view will be refactored to handle other kinds of component files (currently just Contexts and Machines are supported).
UML-B Improvements
Overview
The UML-B plug-in and associated frameworks are developed and maintained by Dr Colin Snook at the University of Southampton. Significant contributions (to the latest version) have been made by Vitaly Savicks (state-machines) and Gintautas Sulskus (Class Diagrams). The UML-B plugin provides UML-like diagrammatic modelling as an extension to Event-B and the Rodin platform. UML-B is an established plug-in which will be developed and improved to support the aims of the ADVANCE project. UML-B was redeveloped during the DEPLOY project to provide closer integration with Event-B. A state-machine diagram editor is already released in this integrated version and a class diagram editor is now being developed as a prototype.
Other improvements will include new diagrammatic notations which are directly related to the aims of ADVANCE, such as component diagrams, as well as more general improvements, such as usability, and any features required by the projects industrial partners.
Motivations / Decisions
The implementation of the UML-B tool is structured to provide re-usable features as much as possible. To achieve this, wherever possible, generic frameworks are developed and the implementation of specific diagram tools is minimised by utilising these frameworks. The following frameworks are now in use by UML-B and available as a basis for future diagrammatic modelling notations.
- The Event-B EMF framework provides an EMF basis for Event-B models (developed during the DEPLOY project). Indeed, it provides an EMF representation of Event-B models with persistence into the Rodin database.
- The Event-B EMF Support for Modelling Extensions framework provides support for extending Event-B with new modelling features (initially developed during the DEPLOY project and now being extended in the ADVANCE project). It provides Navigator support for EMF-only model elements, a persistence mechanism for model extensions that are not needed to be processed by Rodin and a Generic Refiner for modelling extensions (which has recently been added).
- The Event-B GMF Diagrams Generic Support framework provides support for developing new diagram notations (started in the DEPLOY project but mostly developed during the ADVANCE project). It provides generic support for diagrammatic aspects of modelling extensions, and a generic validation and Event-B generation service (which has recently been added).
A new release of the state-machine diagram editor has been made. This release corrected some problems and improved use of the generic framework features.
Work is in progress on a new version of the UML-B Class Diagram editor. This takes the same approach as the state-machines editor in that the models are contained within machines (and, in this case, also contexts) and that diagrammatic model features link to and enhance existing Event-B elements rather than generate everything. The Class diagram editor is currently a prototype and has not been released.
Available Documentation
A paper exists about the framework for diagrammatic modelling extension in Rodin: Savicks, Vitaly, Snook, Colin (2012) A Framework for Diagrammatic Modelling Extensions in Rodin in Rodin User & Developer Workshop 2012 Proceedings. Newcastle University. (Unpublished) [8]
Wiki pages are available for developers using the Generic extensions and Diagrams frameworks:
http://wiki.event-b.org/index.php/EMF_framework_for_Event-B
http://wiki.event-b.org/index.php/Generic_Event-B_EMF_extensions (Under Construction)
A paper exists about the Event-B state-machines: Savicks, Vitaly, Snook, Colin and Butler, Michael (2009) Animation of UML-B State-machines in Rodin User & Developer Workshop 2010 Proceedings. Düsseldorf University, 2010.[9]
Wiki pages are available for users of UML-B, everything starts from http://wiki.event-b.org/index.php/UML-B[10]
Planning
The following work is planned:
- Re-base the Event-B EMF framework on the EMF model of the Rodin database (which is now available as a result of the development of a new Rodin editor to replace the form based editor).
- Re-write the Event-B generator of the state-machine diagram editor so that it uses the generic generator from the Event-B GMF Support for Generic Diagrams framework. This will improve performance.
- Improve the state-machine diagram animation interface so that it supports animation of multiple diagrams.
- Complete the development of the new version of the UML-B Class Diagram editor.
- Develop Animation interface for the Class diagram editor.
- Develop a Component diagram editor and associated simulation tools.
Code generation
Overview
The code generation feature provides the support for the generation of code from refined Event-B models. The development of the approach, and the tools to support it, involved a number of team members at Southampton. To this end a multi-tasking approach, which is conceptually similar to that of the Ada tasking model, was designed. Tasks are modelled by an extension to Event-B, called Tasking Machines which are an extension of the existing Event-B Machine component. The latest Code Generation feature was released on 30th May 2012. The new features in this release include code generation from state-machine diagrams (see UML-B).
Motivations / Decisions
State-machines are frequently used to describe the behaviour of embedded systems. It is a relatively new feature in Event-B, and we augment the tool with the ability to generate code from state-machine diagrams in version 0.2.3 of the code generation feature plug-in. Implementation code is generated from the diagram itself, and no additional mark-up of the model is required; that is, nothing over and above the usual mark-up required for Tasking Event-B, such as identifying non-typing/typing invariants, and guards etc. State-machines are created, using the existing state-machine plug-in, subject to the limitations described after.
The current code generation tool is restricted to generating code for a single Event-B machine, which may contain one or more state-machines. We have yet to explore the decomposition/composition of machines containing state-machines. In principal we should be able to apply decomposition techniques to decompose the single Event-B machine with state-machines into a number of machines, with the state-machines, or the elements of state-machines, distributed between them. Another limitation is that we do not handle nested state-machines, although this should be feasible. Only the state-machines of tasking/environ machines generate code. State-machines of shared machines do not generate code. This should be explored further during research into decomposition.
The translation of the diagrammatic elements to code has been hard-coded in the code generation plug-in. We have introduced new types to the translator's common language model (IL1). We add case-statements, and a container for them (analogous to switch) since these are commonly used to implement state-machines. The code generator navigates through each state of a state-machine, generating an internal representation of the state-machine, which is used to create the IL1 model. The IL1 model is then used to generate code for the various target languages that may have been implemented. We have also updated the IL1-to-target code generators, to generate case/switch statements in Ada, C and Java. Each state-machine has an Enumerated type whose elements take the names of the states. A state variable is created in the target that keeps track of the current state, and has the type of the enumeration.
Available Documentation
A specific page on the Event-B wiki[11] is dedicated to Code Generation Updates.
Planning
Efforts will focus on extending the existing code generation approach, and developing new techniques, for the simulation of cyber-physical systems.
ProR
Overview
The Rodin/ProR integration plugin is developed and maintained by Lukas Ladenberger and Michael Jastram at the University of Duesseldorf. ProR is a tool for working with requirements in natural language. It is part of the Eclipse Requirements Modeling Framework (RMF).[12]
The following paragraphs will give an overview of the the work that has been performed concerning maintenance on the Rodin/ProR plugin.
Motivations / Decisions
The motivation of the Rodin/ProR integration plugin was to bring two complimentary fields of research, requirements engineering and formal modelling, closer together. Especially, the traceability within a system description is a challenging problem of requirements engineering. In particular, formal models of the system are often based on informal requirements, but creating and maintaining the traceability between the two can be challenging. In A Method and Tool for Tracing Requirements into Specifications[13], we presented an incremental approach for producing a system description from an initial set of requirements. The foundation of the approach is a classification of requirements into artefacts W (domain properties), R (requirements) and S (specification). In addition, the approach uses designated phenomena as the vocabulary employed by the artefacts. The central idea is that adequacy of the system description must be justified, meaning that W ∧ S ⇒ R. The approach establishes a traceability, and the resulting system description may consist of formal and informal artefacts. We created tool support for this approach by integrating Rodin and ProR. We designed it with the goal to support the approach described in [13], and to ease the integration of natural language requirements and Event-B.
Available Documentation
- A Method and Tool for Tracing Requirements into Specifications.[13] The paper has been submitted to Science of Computer Programming.
- Requirements Traceability between Textual Requirements and Formal Models Using ProR.[14] The paper has been accepted for iFM'2012 & ABZ'2012.
- A Tutorial for the Rodin/ProR integration[15] can be found on the Event-B wiki.
- The User Guide[16] is available on the Event-B wiki and contains an additional tutorials for ProR.
Planning
There are still some limitations on the ProR/Rodin integration plugin, however. While all required data structures exist, the plugin would benefit from more sophisticated reporting. In particular, the method mentioned above[13] lists a number of properties of a correct system description. For example, the existence of a trace between an artifact and its used phenomenon, or the fact that domain properties, requirement items and design decisions may only be expressed referring to phenomena that are visible in the environment, whereas design decisions and plaform properties may only be expressed referring to phenomena that are visible to the system. While the presence of such properties does not guarantee correctness, their absence indicates a problem. This is already done, to a degree, through the colour highlighting, but a reporting tool that lists all violations of those properties will be implemented.
Currently, each used artifact is identified as belonging to one of the following class: domain properties, requirement items, specification elements, implementation elements, design decisions or platform properties. This in turn determines the different kinds of phenomena that are allowed to be used by the artefact. For the moment, the plugin does not support such classification by phenomenon types. In a next step, we will work on a concept for classifying and maintaining phenomena with ProR.
Camille
Overview
The Camille plug-in provides a textual editor for Rodin. Though such a text editor is prefered by many users, Camille currently has the drawback of not supporting extensibility. It only supports the core Event-B language and plug-in-specific additions are simply ignored. Such extensions can not be edited through Camille. Consequently, users have to switch back to Rodin's native Editor to edit plug-in-specific modelling extensions. This has become a major issue during the last years, since many plug-ins have been developed in the meantime that are widely used by many users.
This issue is currently being adressed by Ingo Weigelt at the University of Duesseldorf.
Motivations / Decisions
A new version of Camille will be implemented during the ADVANCE project to enable users to edit extended Event-B models solely through a text editor. To plan the new version, the problem and a number of possible solutions have been analysed and related in a technical report[17] from Ingo Weigelt. The results of this work have been dicussed in the Rodin community and one of the proposed solution (a blockparser) has been selected to be implemented during the next months. The dedicated solution promises to provide Camille extensibility with minimal extra workload required from plug-in developers while still being very flexible regarding future, yet unknown, requirements.
Available Documentation
- Architectures for an Extensible Text Editor for Rodin.[17] Bachelor thesis analysing the problem and discussing possible solutions.
- An earlier version of the thesis has been published as a technical report[18] that has been discussed on the Roding Developers Mailing List and the ADVANCE Progress Meeting in May 2012 in Paris.
Planning
The new Camille version will be implemented at the University of Duesseldorf during 2012. The final version is expected in January or February 2013.
References
- ↑ http://wiki.event-b.org/index.php/Rodin_Platform_Releases
- ↑ http://sourceforge.net/projects/rodin-b-sharp/
- ↑ http://wiki.event-b.org/index.php/Rodin_Editor
- ↑ http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=108850&atid=651669
- ↑ http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=108850&atid=651672
- ↑ http://wiki.event-b.org/
- ↑ http://www.youtube.com/user/EventBTv
- ↑ http://deploy-eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/382/
- ↑ http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/268261/
- ↑ http://wiki.event-b.org/index.php/UML-B
- ↑ http://wiki.event-b.org/index.php/Code_Generation_Activity
- ↑ http://www.eclipse.org/rmf/
- ↑ 13.0 13.1 13.2 13.3 http://www.stups.uni-duesseldorf.de/w/Special:Publication/HalJasLad2012
- ↑ http://www.stups.uni-duesseldorf.de/w/Special:Publication/LadenbergerJastram_iFMABZ2012
- ↑ http://wiki.event-b.org/index.php/ProR
- ↑ http://wiki.eclipse.org/RMF/User_Guide
- ↑ 17.0 17.1 http://www.stups.uni-duesseldorf.de/mediawiki/images/0/0a/Pub-Weigelt2012.pdf
- ↑ http://www.stups.uni-duesseldorf.de/w/Special:Publication/Weigelt2012>