Talk:Event-B Language: Difference between revisions

From Event-B
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Tianhaiyun
No edit summary
imported>Tianhaiyun
No edit summary
Line 18: Line 18:


Son
Son
== It is not "parsed" but "passed" ==
Much appreciation for that reply. Thanks.
It means that the oblligation for this theorem is listed but remained red. The screen snapshot is
"http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_GexLXHeTL7w/Sub0Xb8WoII/AAAAAAAAAD4/5u5XGKlTBTY/s1600/ebp.jpg"

Revision as of 13:28, 27 October 2009

Rodin Platform Version: 0.9.1

Sequent Prover Auto-tactic : all

The problems is as follows. I build one project, in which there is only one context. In this contest, there is only one theorem defined as {x·x∈0‥4∣x↦0}∈0‥4⇸0‥4. The obligation for it is generated by Rodin. However, it reports that the obligation cannot be passed. It makes me quite confused. Please everyone knowing what the problem is and help me out.

Thank you so lot

HaiYun tian SCM Teesside University

What do you mean by "cannot be parsed"?

I am a bit confused with the "obligation cannot be parsed". I tried to enter this in Rodin (1.1) and there is not such problem. It cannot be automatic proved though.

Cheers,

Son


It is not "parsed" but "passed"

Much appreciation for that reply. Thanks. It means that the oblligation for this theorem is listed but remained red. The screen snapshot is "http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_GexLXHeTL7w/Sub0Xb8WoII/AAAAAAAAAD4/5u5XGKlTBTY/s1600/ebp.jpg"