D45 General Platform Maintenance: Difference between revisions

From Event-B
Jump to navigationJump to search
← Older editNewer edit →
imported>Tommy
imported>Tommy
Line 97: Line 97:
= Choices / Decisions =
= Choices / Decisions =
== Platform maintenance ==
== Platform maintenance ==
SYSTEREL lead a two phase investigation to have a better idea of the work to be done to improve the performance. Each phase being followed by some refactoring of the code. Out of the early investigation, a cause and effect relationship has been found between perfomance loss and the various reported bugs, such as "platform hanging" bugs or even "no more handle" bugs related to the high consumption of graphical elements on Windows platforms. Indeed, it appeared that solving the performance issues sometimes solved induced bugs as well.<br>
Later, a deeper investigation was performed, to indentify and tackle the remaining performance issues. Profiling and code review were the two techniques used. The profiling strategy allowed to get a better localisation of the performance loss in both UI and core code while the code review helped to understand the intrinsic misuses or drawbacks of particular components and/or architectures.
A good example, was the Event-B built-in editor based on form editors with a high use of greedy graphical components. Such architecture appeard to be weak when it was needed to display industrial size models. This affected the modelling experience with some long, and really annoying to the user, reaction lags. To solve such issue, it has been chosen to refactor the editors using a textual representation which was a light-weight graphical alternative to lower the number of needed components. Such refactoring among others made on both core code and UI code, allowed to gain up to 25 times speed-up on the UI, and almost a 2 times speed-up in the core code, making the platform usable again in an industrial context.


== Mathematical extensions / Theory Plug-in ==
== Mathematical extensions / Theory Plug-in ==

Revision as of 14:21, 17 November 2011

Overview

The Rodin platform versions concerned by this deliverable are:

  • 2.1(08.02.2011),
  • 2.2(01.06.2011),
  • 2.2.2(01.08.2011),
  • 2.3(04.10.2011),
  • 2.4(31.01.2011),
  • 2.5(30.04.2011).

This year, the maintenance carried on fixing identified bugs, although an emphasis has been put on correcting usability issues. Indeed, during the meeting in Nice, the WP9 members agreed to refocus on the needed tasks to address some specific bugs and issues reported by DEPLOY partners, and wished resolved by the end of DEPLOY. Thus, no new features were implemented but those appearing in the description of work. The tasks to be performed by the WP9 members were then scheduled, prioritized and regularly updated during the WP9 bi-weekly meetings. The following paragraphs will give an overview of the the work that has been performed concerning maintenance on the existing platform components (i.e. core platform and plug-ins).

See the Release Notes[1] and the SourceForge[1] databases (bugs and feature requests) for details about the previous and upcoming releases of the Rodin platform.

  • Core platform maintenance (Thomas Muller)

According to the previously mentionned refocus, the maintenance tasks performed on the core plateform basically aimed to overcome Rodin scalability weaknesses, and the continuous need of seamless proving experience. The performance was enhanced by core implementation and user interface refactorings. The proving usability was enhanced by the possibility to customize, combine, and parameterize tactics and the addition of new inference and rewriting rules. This will however be details in the chapter relating the prover improvements.

  • TODO An overview of the contribution about Mathematical extensions / Theory Plug-in (Issam Maamria)
  • TODO An overview of the contribution about Plug-in Incompatibilities (All partners)
  • TODO An overview of the contribution about Modularisation (Alexei Illiasov)
  • TODO An overview of the contribution about Decomposition (Renato Silva)
  • TODO An overview of the contribution about Team-based Development (Colin Snook, Vitaly Savicks)
  • TODO An overview of the contribution about UML-B (Colin Snook, Vitaly Savicks)
  • TODO An overview of the contribution about ProR (Michael Jastram)

Motivations

The tasks to solve the issues faced by the DEPLOY partners have been listed and being assigned to groups according to their priority. A high priority means a high need in the outcome of a given task. The group 1 has the highest priority, the group 2 has an intermediate priority, and the group 3 has the lowest priority. The group 4 concerns topics that could not be ressourced during the lifetime of DEPLOY.The prover integrity item although not being directly covered, has been partially addressed thanks to Isabelle and SMT integration. Unfortunately, the originally planned export of full proofs and integrity check is beyond the scope of DEPLOY.


Group 1 (highest priority) Responsible
Performance
- Core (large models, etc.)
- GUI (incl. prover UI, edition, etc.)		 SYSTEREL
Prover Performances
- New rewriting rules / inference rules
- Automatic tactics (preferences, timeout, etc.)		 SYSTEREL
ProB Disprover (incl. counter examples to DLF POs) Düsseldorf
Stability (crash, corruption, etc.) SYSTEREL
Editors SYSTEREL/Düsseldorf
Group 2 Responsible
Prover Performances
- SMT provers integration
- connection with Isabelle
- Mathematical extensions
- ProB
SYSTEREL
ETH Zürich
Southampton/SYSTEREL
Düsseldorf
Scalability
- Decomposition
- Modularisation plug-in
- Team-based development
Southampton
Newcastle
Southampton
Plug-in incompatibilities Newcastle
Model-based testing Pitesti/Düsseldorf
ProR Düsseldorf
Group 3 Responsible
Scalability
- Generic instantiation
- UML-B maintenance

Southampton
ETH Zürich/Southampton
Code Generation Southampton
Group 4
Prover Integrity
Integrity of Code Generation

Platform maintenance

The platform maintenance, as it can be deduced from the above tables in section Motivations, mainly concerned stability and performance improvement. These topics will be discussed and detailed in a separate chapter about scalability improvements.
However, other improvements were added.

Mathematical extensions / Theory Plug-in

TODO To be completed by Issam Maamria

Plug-in Incompatibilities

TODO To be completed by all partners

Modularisation

TODO To be completed by Alexei Illiasov

Decomposition

TODO To be completed by Renato Silva

Team-based Development

TODO To be completed by Colin Snook, Vitaly Savicks

UML-B

TODO To be completed by Colin Snook, Vitaly Savicks

ProR

TODO To be completed by Michael Jastram

Choices / Decisions

Platform maintenance

Mathematical extensions / Theory Plug-in

TODO To be completed by Issam Maamria

Plug-in Incompatibilities

TODO To be completed by all partners

Modularisation

TODO To be completed by Alexei Illiasov

Decomposition

TODO To be completed by Renato Silva

Team-based Development

TODO To be completed by Colin Snook, Vitaly Savicks

UML-B

TODO To be completed by Colin Snook, Vitaly Savicks

ProR

TODO To be completed by Michael Jastram

Available Documentation

  • Core platform:
The following pages give useful information about the Rodin platform releases:
  • Release notes[2].
  • Bugs[3].
  • Feature requests[4].
  • TODO Links for Mathematical extensions / Theory Plug-in
  • TODO Links for Plug-in Incompatibilities
  • TODO Links for Modularisation
  • TODO Links for Decomposition
  • TODO Links for Team-based Development
  • TODO Links for UML-B
  • TODO Links for ProR

Status

Platform maintenance

By the end of the project, there are :

  • xx bugs reported and open. All with a priority lower or equal to 5.
  • xx feature requests expressed and still open.

The necessary tasks have been performed in the last year of DEPLOY to make the platform usable and stable in an industrial context.

Mathematical extensions / Theory Plug-in

TODO To be completed by Issam Maamria

Plug-in Incompatibilities

TODO To be completed by all partners

Modularisation

TODO To be completed by Alexei Illiasov

Decomposition

TODO To be completed by Renato Silva

Team-based Development

TODO To be completed by Colin Snook, Vitaly Savicks

UML-B

TODO To be completed by Colin Snook, Vitaly Savicks

ProR

TODO To be completed by Michael Jastram


References

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 http://wiki.event-b.org/index.php/D32_General_Platform_Maintenance#Available_Documentation Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "documentation" defined multiple times with different content
  2. ↑ http://wiki.event-b.org/index.php/Rodin_Platform_Releases
  3. ↑ https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=108850&atid=651669
  4. ↑ https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=108850&atid=651672
Retrieved from ‘https://wiki.event-b.org/index.php?title=D45_General_Platform_Maintenance&oldid=2801’