Generic Instantiation: Difference between revisions
From Event-B
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Asiehsalehi Replaced content with "The initial proposal from Southampton is as follows. Proposal for generic instantiation of machines. [[Category:Des..." |
imported>Asiehsalehi No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Event-B lacks the ability to instantiate and reuse generic developments in other formal developments. We propose a way of instantiating generic models and extending the instantiation to a chain of refinements. We define sufficient proof obligations to ensure that the proofs associated to a generic development remain valid in an instantiated development thus avoiding re-proofs. | |||
The proposal (from University of Southampton) is as follows. | |||
[[Image:Generic Instantiation Proposal.pdf | Generic Instantiation Proposal]]. | |||
[[Category:Design]] | |||
[[Category:Design | |||
Revision as of 17:50, 4 December 2012
Event-B lacks the ability to instantiate and reuse generic developments in other formal developments. We propose a way of instantiating generic models and extending the instantiation to a chain of refinements. We define sufficient proof obligations to ensure that the proofs associated to a generic development remain valid in an instantiated development thus avoiding re-proofs.
The proposal (from University of Southampton) is as follows. File:Generic Instantiation Proposal.pdf.
