D45 Prover Enhancement: Difference between revisions
imported>Tommy |
imported>Tommy |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
= Motivations = | = Motivations = | ||
== New rewriting and inference rules == | == New rewriting and inference rules == | ||
In an Event-B development, more than 60% of the time is spent on proofs. It has been a continuous aim to increase the number of automatically discharged proof obligations (POs), thus improving the capabilities of the integrated sequent prover through the addition of rewriting and inference rules. These rules were provided through tactics, or existing or newly created. These tactics were automatic, or manual, or sometimes both. | In an Event-B development, more than 60% of the time is spent on proofs. It has been a continuous aim to increase the number of automatically discharged proof obligations (POs), thus improving the capabilities of the integrated sequent prover through the addition of rewriting and inference rules. These rules were provided through tactics, or existing or newly created. These tactics were automatic, or manual, or sometimes both. Providing new tactics, even if it sometimes does increase the number of automatically discharged POs helps the user to interactively discharge them and make him spare time by making proofs easier. | ||
== Advanced Preferences for Auto-tactics == | == Advanced Preferences for Auto-tactics == | ||
Revision as of 18:10, 18 November 2011
Overview
Two tasks concerned the prover performance from the core platform: the addition of rewriting and inference rules, and the addition of a mechanism to allow the customization and the parameterization or combination of tactics. While the addition of rewriting and inference rules has always been a regular task to enhance the Rodin integrated prover during DEPLOY lifetime, a new way to manage tactics has been implemented. In fact, since Rodin 2.1, the user is able to define various types of tactic strategies called 'profiles' which could allow him to adapt the order of the basic tactics an discharge some particular proof obligations accordingly. Moreover, since Rodin 2.3, the user is able to combine and parameterize these profiles increasing even more the potential of such proving feature.
- TODO An overview of the contribution about the ProB Disprover (Daniel Plagge, Jens Bendiposto)
- TODO An overview of the contribution about the SMT Solver Integration (Laurent Voisin)
Motivations
New rewriting and inference rules
In an Event-B development, more than 60% of the time is spent on proofs. It has been a continuous aim to increase the number of automatically discharged proof obligations (POs), thus improving the capabilities of the integrated sequent prover through the addition of rewriting and inference rules. These rules were provided through tactics, or existing or newly created. These tactics were automatic, or manual, or sometimes both. Providing new tactics, even if it sometimes does increase the number of automatically discharged POs helps the user to interactively discharge them and make him spare time by making proofs easier.
Advanced Preferences for Auto-tactics
TODO To be completed by Nicolas Beauger
Isabelle Plug-in
TODO To be completed by Matthias Schmaltz
ProB Disprover
TODO Daniel Plagge, Jens Bendiposto
SMT Solver Integration
TODO Laurent Voisin
Choices / Decisions
New rewriting and inference rules
TODO To be completed by Laurent Voisin
Advanced Preferences for Auto-tactics
TODO To be completed by Nicolas Beauger
Isabelle Plug-in
TODO To be completed by Matthias Schmaltz
ProB Disprover
TODO Daniel Plagge, Jens Bendiposto
SMT Solver Integration
TODO Laurent Voisin
Available Documentation
- TODO Links for New rewriting and inference rules
- TODO Links for Advanced Preferences for Auto-tactics
- TODO Links for Isabelle Plug-in
- TODO Links for ProB Disprover
- TODO Links for SMT Solver Integration
Status
New rewriting and inference rules
TODO To be completed by Laurent Voisin
Advanced Preferences for Auto-tactics
TODO To be completed by Nicolas Beauger
Isabelle Plug-in
TODO To be completed by Matthias Schmaltz
ProB Disprover
TODO Daniel Plagge, Jens Bendiposto
SMT Solver Integration
TODO Laurent Voisin
