Proposals of Changes to the Mathematical Language Specification: Difference between revisions
From Event-B
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Wohuai New page: =Change Proposals to Version 1.0= * Matthias: Section 2.3 says that integer literals are unsigned, i.e., nonnegative. In Arithmetic Rewrite Rules, it is assumed that integer literals ... |
imported>Wohuai mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Change Proposals to Version 1.0= | =Change Proposals to Version 1.0= | ||
* Matthias: Section 2.3 says that integer literals are unsigned, i.e., nonnegative. In [[Arithmetic Rewrite Rules]], it is assumed that integer literals may also be negative. I therefore propose to say in Section 2.3 that integer literals can be positive, zero, or negative, but that negative literals such as -1 are parsed to unary minus followed by 1. | * Matthias: Section 2.3 says that integer literals are unsigned, i.e., nonnegative. In [[Arithmetic Rewrite Rules]], it is however assumed that integer literals may also be negative. I therefore propose to say in Section 2.3 that integer literals can be positive, zero, or negative, but that negative literals such as -1 are parsed to unary minus followed by 1. | ||
Revision as of 09:27, 11 January 2010
Change Proposals to Version 1.0
- Matthias: Section 2.3 says that integer literals are unsigned, i.e., nonnegative. In Arithmetic Rewrite Rules, it is however assumed that integer literals may also be negative. I therefore propose to say in Section 2.3 that integer literals can be positive, zero, or negative, but that negative literals such as -1 are parsed to unary minus followed by 1.
