Structured Types: Difference between revisions
From Event-B
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>WikiSysop |
imported>WikiSysop |
||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
Now, given an element <math>c\in C</math> representing a record structure, we write <math>e(c)</math> for the ''e'' component of ''c'' and math>f(c)</math> for the ''f'' component of ''c''. | Now, given an element <math>c\in C</math> representing a record structure, we write <math>e(c)</math> for the ''e'' component of ''c'' and <math>f(c)</math> for the ''f'' component of ''c''. |
Revision as of 16:07, 1 May 2009
Modelling Structured Types
The Event-B mathematical language currently does not support a syntax for the direct definition of structured types such as records or class structures. Nevertheless it is possible to model structured types using projection functions to represent the fields/attributes. For example, suppose we wish to model a record structure C with fields e and f (with type E and F respectively). Let us use the following syntax for this (not part of Event-B syntax):
We can model this structure in Event-B by introducing (in a context) a carrier set C and two functions e and f as constants as follows:
Now, given an element representing a record structure, we write for the e component of c and for the f component of c.