Inference Rules
From Event-B
Conventions used in these tables are described in The_Proving_Perspective_(Rodin_User_Manual)#Inference_Rules
| Name | Rule | Side Condition | A/M
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| * | HYP | ![]() |
A
| |
| * | HYP_OR | ![]() |
A
| |
| * | CNTR | ![]() |
A
| |
| * | FALSE_HYP | ![]() |
A
| |
| * | TRUE_GOAL | ![]() |
A
| |
| * | DBL_HYP | ![]() |
A
| |
| * | AND_L | ![]() |
A
| |
| * | AND_R | ![]() |
A
| |
| * | IMP_L1 | ![]() |
A
| |
| * | IMP_R | ![]() |
A
| |
| * | IMP_AND_L | ![]() |
A
| |
| * | IMP_OR_L | ![]() |
A
| |
| * | NEG_IN_L | ![]() |
A
| |
| * | NEG_IN_R | ![]() |
A
| |
| * | XST_L | ![]() |
A
| |
| * | ALL_R | ![]() |
A
| |
| * | EQL_LR | ![]() |
is a variable which is not free in ![]() |
A
|
| * | EQL_RL | ![]() |
is a variable which is not free in ![]() |
A
|
| SUBSET_INTER | ![]() |
the operator must appear at the "top level" |
A
| |
| IN_INTER | ![]() |
the operator must appear at the "top level" |
A
| |
| NOTIN_INTER | ![]() |
the operator must appear at the "top level" |
A
| |
| * | CONTRADICT_L | ![]() |
M
| |
| * | CONTRADICT_R | ![]() |
M
| |
| * | CASE | ![]() |
M
| |
| * | MH | ![]() |
M
| |
| * | HM | ![]() |
M
| |
| * | EQV | ![]() |
M
| |
| * | OV_L | ![]() |
the operator must appear at the "top level" |
M
|
| * | OV_R | ![]() |
the operator must appear at the "top level" |
M
|
| * | OV_L | ![]() |
the operator must appear at the "top level" |
M
|
| * | OV_R | ![]() |
the operator must appear at the "top level" |
M
|
| * | DIS_BINTER_R | ![]() |
the occurrence of must appear at the "top level". Moreover and denote some type. Similar left distribution rules exist |
M
|
| * | DIS_SETMINUS_R | ![]() |
the occurrence of must appear at the "top level". Moreover and denote some type. Similar left distribution rules exist |
M
|
| * | SIM_REL_IMAGE_R | ![]() |
the occurrence of must appear at the "top level". A similar left simplification rule exists. |
M
|
| * | SIM_FCOMP_R | ![]() |
the occurrence of must appear at the "top level". A similar left simplification rule exists. |
M
|
| * | FIN_SUBSETEQ_R | ![]() |
the user has to write the set corresponding to in the editing area of the Proof Control Window |
M
|
| * | FIN_BINTER_R | ![]() |
M
| |
| * | FIN_SETMINUS_R | ![]() |
M
| |
| * | FIN_REL_R | ![]() |
the user has to write the set corresponding to in the editing area of the Proof Control Window |
M
|
| * | FIN_REL_IMG_R | ![]() |
the user has to write the set corresponding to in the editing area of the Proof Control Window |
M
|
| * | FIN_REL_RAN_R | ![]() |
the user has to write the set corresponding to in the editing area of the Proof Control Window |
M
|
| * | FIN_REL_DOM_R | ![]() |
the user has to write the set corresponding to in the editing area of the Proof Control Window |
M
|
| * | FIN_FUN1_R | ![]() |
the user has to write the set corresponding to in the editing area of the Proof Control Window |
M
|
| * | FIN_FUN2_R | ![]() |
the user has to write the set corresponding to in the editing area of the Proof Control Window |
M
|
| * | FIN_FUN_IMG_R | ![]() |
the user has to write the set corresponding to in the editing area of the Proof Control Window |
M
|
| * | FIN_FUN_RAN_R | ![]() |
the user has to write the set corresponding to in the editing area of the Proof Control Window |
M
|
| * | FIN_FUN_DOM_R | ![]() |
the user has to write the set corresponding to in the editing area of the Proof Control Window |
M
|
| * | LOWER_BOUND_L | ![]() |
must not contain any bound variable |
M
|
| * | LOWER_BOUND_R | ![]() |
must not contain any bound variable |
M
|
| * | UPPER_BOUND_L | ![]() |
must not contain any bound variable |
M
|
| * | UPPER_BOUND_R | ![]() |
must not contain any bound variable |
M
|
| * | FIN_LT_0 | ![]() |
M
| |
| * | FIN_GE_0 | ![]() |
M
| |
| * | CARD_INTERV | ![]() |
must appear at "top-level" |
M
|
| * | CARD_EMPTY_INTERV | ![]() |
must appear at "top-level" |
M
|
| * | CARD_SUBSETEQ | ![]() |
M
| |
| * | FORALL_INST | ![]() |
is instantiated with ![]() |
M
|
| * | FORALL_INST_MP | ![]() |
is instantiated with and a Modus Ponens is applied |
M
|
| * | CUT | ![]() |
hypothesis is added |
M
|
| * | EXISTS_INST | ![]() |
is instantiated with ![]() |
M
|
| * | DISTINCT_CASE | ![]() |
case distinction on predicate ![]() |
M |

















is a variable which is not free in 


operator must appear at the "top level"








operator must appear at the "top level"


![\frac{\textbf{H} \;\;\vdash\;\; f^{-1} \in A \pfun B \qquad\textbf{H} \;\;\vdash\;\;\textbf{Q}(f[S] \binter f[T]) }{\textbf{H} \;\;\vdash \;\; \textbf{Q}(f[S \binter T]) \ \ \ \ \ }](/images/math/5/3/8/538882eb3fc5acd65e54da755e9513ae.png)
must appear at the "top level". Moreover
and
denote some type. Similar left distribution rules exist![\frac{\textbf{H} \;\;\vdash\;\; f \in A \pfun B \qquad\textbf{H} \;\;\vdash\;\;\textbf{Q}(f^{-1}[S] \setminus f^{-1}[T]) }{\textbf{H} \;\;\vdash \;\; \textbf{Q}(f^{-1}[S \setminus T]) \ \ \ \ \ }](/images/math/7/b/0/7b04e53df06f010824217b1e9aed63da.png)
![\frac{\textbf{H} \; \; \vdash \; \; {WD}(\textbf{Q}(\{ f(E)\} )) \qquad\textbf{H} \; \; \vdash \; \; \textbf{Q}(\{ f(E)\} ) }{\textbf{H} \; \; \vdash \; \; \textbf{Q}(f[\{ E\} ])}](/images/math/7/d/f/7dfac56e8c4269e247b888bd790b211d.png)
must appear at the "top level". A similar left simplification rule exists.
must appear at the "top level". A similar left simplification rule exists.
in the editing area of the Proof Control Window


in the editing area of the Proof Control Window![\frac{\textbf{H} \;\;\vdash \;\; \finite\,(r) }{\textbf{H} \;\;\vdash \;\; \finite\,(r[s]) \ \ \ \ \ \ \ }](/images/math/7/d/1/7d1b728949ca9ee920276cc4d7b89997.png)
in the editing area of the Proof Control Window



![\frac{\textbf{H} \;\;\vdash \;\; f \;\in\; S \pfun T \qquad \textbf{H} \;\;\vdash \;\; \finite\,(s) }{\textbf{H} \;\;\vdash \;\; \finite\,(f[s]) \ \ \ \ \ \ \ }](/images/math/c/1/3/c13b905d1407ea16b0e2c7c7e2d3309b.png)



must not contain any bound variable





must appear at "top-level"

![\frac{\textbf{H} \;\;\vdash \;\; {WD}(E) \qquad \textbf{H} , [x \bcmeq E]\textbf{P} \;\;\vdash \;\; \textbf{G}}{\textbf{H}, \forall x \qdot \textbf{P} \;\;\vdash\;\; \textbf{G}}](/images/math/a/c/b/acb596a712a0f720a7d3238f967ccfe6.png)
![\frac{\textbf{H} \;\;\vdash \;\; {WD}(E) \qquad \textbf{H}, {WD}(E) \;\;\vdash \;\; [x \bcmeq E]\textbf{P} \qquad \textbf{H}, {WD}(E), [x \bcmeq E]\textbf{Q} \;\;\vdash \;\; \textbf{G}}{\textbf{H}, \forall x \qdot \textbf{P} \limp \textbf{Q} \;\;\vdash\;\; \textbf{G}}](/images/math/e/2/5/e25e646ecaceca4cb4143a3e66dbb185.png)

is added![\frac{\textbf{H} \;\;\vdash \;\; {WD}(E) \qquad \textbf{H} , [x \bcmeq E]\textbf{P} \;\;\vdash \;\; \textbf{G}}{\textbf{H}, \exists x \qdot \textbf{P} \;\;\vdash\;\; \textbf{G}}](/images/math/a/3/a/a3af36c01f37d2d738cde14ec1be4e20.png)
