Search results

From Event-B
Jump to navigationJump to search
  • ...sh the soundness of provers and improve the generation of well-definedness proof obligations,
    3 KB (415 words) - 17:03, 24 November 2010
  • * There is a bug in showing interface proof obligations - these are not refreshed automtically in the project explorer. * No proof obligations are generated to ensure deadlock freeness of event groups reali
    4 KB (601 words) - 23:58, 13 October 2009
  • ...tronger types of connectives. Let us see what it means to provide a formal proof for the various cases of sequential event composition. ...g "immediately after" <math>m</math> times there would be <math>m*n</math> proof obligations. Even if only a small fraction of these result in interactive p
    11 KB (1,869 words) - 23:48, 21 January 2011
  • ...resent systems at different abstraction levels and the use of mathematical proof to verify consistency between refinement levels. ...or Event-B that provides effective support for refinement and mathematical proof. The platform is open source, contributes to the Eclipse framework and is f
    3 KB (395 words) - 08:48, 7 January 2010
  • ...provided architecture for static checking is really similar to the one for proof obligation generation. Thus, it can be useful for the reader to understand ...oof obligation, which is described in the paper. This PO overrides the FIN proof obligation. Thus we will see here, how to :
    13 KB (1,755 words) - 07:19, 7 September 2010
  • effective support for modelling and automated proof. The platform is open * Proof automation for Event-B theories — ''P. Rivière, N. K. Singh, Y. Aït-Ame
    3 KB (375 words) - 15:36, 26 May 2023
  • ...valid reasoner (old version or not installed) is properly displayed in the Proof Skeleton View. ...been used; running 'Proof Replay on Undischarged POs' will replay the old proof with the current version of the reasoner.
    6 KB (909 words) - 13:48, 17 December 2014
  • ...the ADVANCE Deliverable D3.4 (Methods and tools for model construction and proof III) which will be delivered to the European Commission at month 38 (2014-1 ...ivery of improvements to both tools and methods for model construction and proof against the original plan. In addition, it reports on the development of fo
    5 KB (780 words) - 14:57, 6 October 2014
  • *A comprehensive specification of the logic (abstract syntax, semantics, proof calculus, core theories) is available as [ftp://ftp.inf.ethz.ch/pub/publica
    1 KB (203 words) - 11:28, 23 January 2014
  • ..._Proof_Obligation_Generator(How_to_extend_Rodin_Tutorial) | Generating the proof obligations]] | Up= [[Plug-in_Tutorial|How to extend Rodin Tutorial (Index) ...I that paint their applications in red on formulas) in case of interactive proof.<br>
    13 KB (2,012 words) - 15:43, 21 September 2021
  • ...e the diversity of predicates and increase the automated proofs of trivial proof obligations often encountered in degenerated cases (that is not interesting The proportion of automatically discharged proof obligations heavily depends on the auto-tactic configuration. Sometimes, th
    7 KB (1,145 words) - 10:05, 8 October 2013
  • ...uent prover is a plug-in for the Eclipse platform which provides different proof rules to be used within the Rodin Tool. The following sections discuss the == Proof Rules ==
    17 KB (2,378 words) - 09:48, 17 June 2010
  • 805 IAE when loading proof 807 Proof information view text cut off
    5 KB (775 words) - 12:00, 4 April 2023
  • ...domains and observed that his tactic significantly increases the number of proof obligations proved automatically. ...nstruction, and a methodology for reasoning about the soundness of Event-B proof rules within Event-B. The document also allows users to look-up definitions
    11 KB (1,699 words) - 15:25, 27 January 2011
  • ...to deal with a growing number of events, state variables, and consequently proof obligations. ...management. In other words, it alleviates the complexity by splitting the proof obligations over the sub-models.
    6 KB (825 words) - 13:27, 27 January 2010
  • ** A proof obligation is generated for the well-definedness condition of recursive ope ** Theorems instantiated during proof are now correctly typed (in some cases, some type information was missing)
    8 KB (1,015 words) - 13:50, 1 April 2022
  • ...renaming an element doesn't modify their existing proof state (no loss of proof). Since there are proof obligations associated with Event-B files, while renaming the goal would be
    11 KB (1,773 words) - 07:41, 12 January 2016
  • When proof obligations (POs) are not discharged automatically the user can attempt to ...es, the Proof Control, the Search Hypotheses, the Cache Hypotheses and the Proof Information. In the discussion that follows we look at each of these views
    27 KB (4,348 words) - 08:56, 26 September 2011
  • When proof obligations (POs) are not discharged automatically the user can attempt to ...es, the Proof Control, the Search Hypotheses, the Cache Hypotheses and the Proof Information. In the discussion that follows we look at each of these views
    27 KB (4,348 words) - 18:45, 28 September 2011
  • ...[Extending_the_Static_Checker(How_to_extend_Rodin_Tutorial)|Generating the proof obligations]]}} ...provided architecture for static checking is really similar to the one for proof obligation generation. Thus, it can be useful for the reader to understand
    13 KB (1,774 words) - 13:57, 5 September 2013

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)