Difference between revisions of "Talk:Event-B Language"
From Event-B
Jump to navigationJump to searchimported>Tianhaiyun (The problem encountered when using Rodin.) |
imported>Son (→What do you mean by "cannot be parsed"?: new section) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
HaiYun tian | HaiYun tian | ||
SCM Teesside University | SCM Teesside University | ||
| + | |||
| + | == What do you mean by "cannot be parsed"? == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I am a bit confused with the "obligation cannot be parsed". I tried to enter this in Rodin (1.1) and there is not such problem. It cannot be automatic proved though. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Cheers, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Son | ||
Revision as of 13:10, 27 October 2009
Rodin Platform Version: 0.9.1
Sequent Prover Auto-tactic : all
The problems is as follows. I build one project, in which there is only one context. In this contest, there is only one theorem defined as {x·x∈0‥4∣x↦0}∈0‥4⇸0‥4. The obligation for it is generated by Rodin. However, it reports that the obligation can cannot be passed. It makes me quite confused. Please everyone knowing what the problem is and help me out.
Thank you so lot
HaiYun tian SCM Teesside University
What do you mean by "cannot be parsed"?
I am a bit confused with the "obligation cannot be parsed". I tried to enter this in Rodin (1.1) and there is not such problem. It cannot be automatic proved though.
Cheers,
Son
