Difference between revisions of "Talk:Event-B Language"

From Event-B
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Tianhaiyun
imported>Tianhaiyun
Line 24: Line 24:
 
It means that the oblligation for this theorem is listed but remained red. The screen snapshot is  
 
It means that the oblligation for this theorem is listed but remained red. The screen snapshot is  
 
"http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_GexLXHeTL7w/Sub0Xb8WoII/AAAAAAAAAD4/5u5XGKlTBTY/s1600/ebp.jpg"
 
"http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_GexLXHeTL7w/Sub0Xb8WoII/AAAAAAAAAD4/5u5XGKlTBTY/s1600/ebp.jpg"
 +
 +
Futhermore, I have installed the newest version of Rodin (rodin-1.1RC1). I put "{x·x∈0‥4∣x↦0}∈0‥4⇸0‥4" in the AXIOMS and tick it as a theorem. However, the problem is the same as Rodin 0.9.1.

Revision as of 13:43, 27 October 2009

Rodin Platform Version: 0.9.1

Sequent Prover Auto-tactic : all

The problems is as follows. I build one project, in which there is only one context. In this contest, there is only one theorem defined as {x·x∈0‥4∣x↦0}∈0‥4⇸0‥4. The obligation for it is generated by Rodin. However, it reports that the obligation cannot be passed. It makes me quite confused. Please everyone knowing what the problem is and help me out.

Thank you so lot

HaiYun tian SCM Teesside University

What do you mean by "cannot be parsed"?

I am a bit confused with the "obligation cannot be parsed". I tried to enter this in Rodin (1.1) and there is not such problem. It cannot be automatic proved though.

Cheers,

Son


It is not "parsed" but "passed"

Much appreciation for that reply. Thanks. It means that the oblligation for this theorem is listed but remained red. The screen snapshot is "http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_GexLXHeTL7w/Sub0Xb8WoII/AAAAAAAAAD4/5u5XGKlTBTY/s1600/ebp.jpg"

Futhermore, I have installed the newest version of Rodin (rodin-1.1RC1). I put "{x·x∈0‥4∣x↦0}∈0‥4⇸0‥4" in the AXIOMS and tick it as a theorem. However, the problem is the same as Rodin 0.9.1.