ADVANCE D3.3 Model Checking
Experience with industrial case studies, such as those of WP1 and WP2, have demonstrated that animation and model checking are important tools when building a model. Animation allows the user to validate if the model corresponds to the user's intentions. Model checking allows to check if the model contains errors and provides counter-examples that help to understand the problem beforehand. Moreover, it allows to reason with domains (like physical units) and verify some properties (like temporal logic ones), that have currently no matching proof support. The following activities were pursued within the project:
- The constraint solving capabilities of ProB have been continuously improved along with scalability improvements.
- Previously we implemented a TLA to B compiler to use ProB on TLA+ specifications. We now also support the direction from B to TLA+. This allows to use the TCL model checker on B specifications.
- There is work in progress towards support of the upcoming 2.0 version of the Theory plug-in.
- We are working on a secondary independent toolchain for animation.
- We finalized and released the of physical units plug-in.
Outside ADVANCE we improved the model checker by adding support for distributed model checking, partial order reduction and partial guard evaluation. We think that these improvements are also valuable within the ADVANCE project.
Motivations / Decisions
Independently of ProB we completed the development of a tool, which is able read solutions (constant and variable-values) generated by ProB and evaluate predicates like the properties or the invariant of a B model. Also it is possible to evaluate expression in an interactive mode or animate B machines. The tool is (with the exception of the parser) a complete new implementation of a predicate/expression B-evaluator and animator in python. The goal of the reimplementation is to establish a second independent toolchain to crosscheck results of ProB. The python tool has been successfully tested with industrial B Models from the railway domain. The tool is available from http://github.com/hhu-stups/pyB
B to TLA+
We developed a transcompiler from B to TLA+ (Temporal Logic of Actions) to verify B specifications with TLC. TLC is an explicit state model checker for TLA+ with an efficient disk-based algorithm and support for temporal formulas and fairness.Our translator is full automatic and supports a large subset of B. Moreover it uses static analyses to verify the validity of the B specification (e.g. type checking and scope checking) and creates an optimized translation for the validation with TLC. Error traces (e.g. leading to deadlocks or invariant violations) detected by TLC are translated back to B and can be verified by ProB.
Kodkod is a Java library that provides an interface to SAT solvers for solving relational problems. In  we described a translation from B/Event-B to Kodkod where we applied the translation to improve finding values for the constants of a model and ProB's constraint based deadlock check. We have now applied the technique to check theories of a context in Event-B, check assertions in classical B and to the constraint-based invariant check. It became apparent that reducing the model to a relevant set of variables and predicates can improve the applicability of the method because often only a part of a model can be translated to Kodkod. We have implemented such a slicing of the model and plan to validate if this leads to a performance improvement when we use only ProB's constraint solver without Kodkod.
Theory Plug-in support
We adapted ProB to the changes that had been made to the Theory Plug-in in preparation of the upcoming release. ProB had support for recursive data types and operators that were defined by direct definitions. Also the SUM and PRODUCT operators were explicitly supported. Additionally we implemented now support for the theory of transitive closures. From the current set of standard theories, ProB supports animation of models that use operators of the theories "BoolOps", "FixPoint", "Seq", "SUMandPRODUCT" and "closure". Still unsupported are the operators of the remaining standard theories "BinaryTree" and "List" which use recursively defined operators. We plan to implement support for them for the next release.
We currently explore ways to implement Fairness into ProB's LTL model checker. However, it is already possible to use fairness by using the B to TLA translator and running TLC.
The work on physical unit support has been completed and is available as an optional plug-in available from the ProB update site.
The ProB Website is the place where we collect information on the ProB toolset. There are several tutorials on ProB available in the User manual section. We also supply documentation on extending ProB for developers.
In addition we run a bug tracking system to document known bugs, workarounds and feature requests.
A developer-, user documentation, tutorial and examples are available from a dedicated webpage hosted by the University of Duesseldorf.
- We will continue to work on the translation of B to TLA+ in order to use the TLC model checker. The translation needs to be validated and more of the full classical B language needs to be covered. We will also strive to make TLC available within Rodin for Event-B specifications.
- We will also continue to try to add fairness constraints efficiently both to ProB's own model checker and via the translation to TLC.
- We will continue our work on porting BMotionStudio to HTML. We want to define an open architecture that allows re-using BMotionStudio outside of ProB.
- We will further improve support for theories with recursive functions and try to make recursive functions more efficient.
- We will continue evaluating and improving our SAT backend via Kodkod and also evaluate the possibility of using SMT backends.