Difference between revisions of "Mathematical Extensions"

From Event-B
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Pascal
imported>Pascal
Line 40: Line 40:
 
** getting Base / Source / Target type (type rule needed)
 
** getting Base / Source / Target type (type rule needed)
 
* Formula Factory
 
* Formula Factory
 +
* Verification of preconditions (see for example <tt>AssociativeExpression.checkPreconditions</tt>)
  
 
== Impact on other tools ==
 
== Impact on other tools ==

Revision as of 11:31, 4 February 2010

Currently the operators and basic predicates of the Event-B mathematical language supported by Rodin are fixed. We propose to extend Rodin to define basic predicates, new operators or new algebraic types.

Requirements

User Requirements

  • Binary operators (prefix form, infix form or suffix form).
  • Operators on boolean expressions.
  • Unary operators, such as absolute values.
Note the the pipe, which is already used for set comprehension, cannot be used to enter absolute values.
  • Basic predicates (e.g., the symmetry of relations sym(R) \defi R=R^{-1}).
Having a way to enter such predicates may be considered as syntactic sugar, because it is already possible to use sets (e.g., R \in sym, where sym \defi \{R \mid R=R ^{-1}\}) or functions (e.g., sym(R) = \True, where sym \defi \lambda(R) \qdot (R \in A \rel B \mid \bool(R = R^{-1}))).
  • Quantified expressions (e.g., \sum x \qdot (P \mid y), \prod x \qdot (P \mid y), ~\min(S), ~\max(S)).

User Input

The end-user shall provide the following information:

  • Lexicon and Syntax.
    More precisely, it includes the symbols, the form (prefix, infix, postfix), the grammar, associativity (left-associative or right associative), commutativity, priority, the mode (flattened or not), ...
  • Pretty-print.
    Alternatively, the rendering may be determined from the notation parameters passed to the parser.
  • Typing rules.
  • Well-definedness.

Development Requirements

  • Scalability.

Towards a generic AST

The following AST parts are to become generic, or at least parameterised:

  • Lexer
  • Parser
  • Nodes ( Formula class hierarchy ): parameters needed for:
    • Type Solve (type rule needed to synthesize the type)
    • Type Check (type rule needed to verify constraints on children types)
    • WD (WD predicate)
    • PrettyPrint (tag image + notation (prefix, infix, postfix))
    • Visit Formula (getting children + visitor callback mechanism)
    • Rewrite Formula (associative formulæ have a specific flattening treatment)
  • Types (Type class hierarchy): parameters needed for:
    • Building the type expression (type rule needed)
    • PrettyPrint (set operator image)
    • getting Base / Source / Target type (type rule needed)
  • Formula Factory
  • Verification of preconditions (see for example AssociativeExpression.checkPreconditions)

Impact on other tools

Impacted plug-ins (use a factory to build formulæ):

  • org.eventb.core
  • org.eventb.core.seqprover
  • org.eventb.pp
  • org.eventb.pptrans
  • org.eventb.ui

Identified problems

Bibliography

This proposal consists in considering three kinds of extension:
  1. Extensions of set-theoretic expressions or predicates: example extensions of this kind consist in adding the transitive closure of relations or various ordered relations.
  2. Extensions of the library of theorems for predicates and operators.
  3. Extensions of the Set Theory itself through the definition of algebraic types such as lists or ordered trees using new set constructors.