Search results

Create the page "Proof" on this wiki! See also the search results found.

Page title matches

• ADVANCE D3.3 Improvement of automated proof
  ...e the diversity of predicates and increase the automated proofs of trivial proof obligations often encountered in degenerated cases (that is not interesting The proportion of automatically discharged proof obligations heavily depends on the auto-tactic configuration. Sometimes, th
  7 KB (1,145 words) - 10:05, 8 October 2013
• Current Proof Tree Node in UI
  ...e Environment) display some information which is associated to the current proof tree node, if any. However, in Rodin 2.3 these view do not always display t ...w does not refresh. One has to click on the current proof tree node in the Proof Tree view to force a refresh.
  4 KB (683 words) - 18:33, 16 December 2011
• Proof Obligation Names (Rodin User Manual)
  Next is a table describing the names of context proof obligations: Next is a table showing the name of machine proof obligations:
  4 KB (575 words) - 15:09, 15 September 2011
• Extending the Proof Obligation Generator(How to extend Rodin Tutorial)
  ...[Extending_the_Static_Checker(How_to_extend_Rodin_Tutorial)|Generating the proof obligations]]}} ...provided architecture for static checking is really similar to the one for proof obligation generation. Thus, it can be useful for the reader to understand
  13 KB (1,774 words) - 13:57, 5 September 2013
• Extending the Proof Obligation Generator (How to extend Rodin Tutorial)
  ...provided architecture for static checking is really similar to the one for proof obligation generation. Thus, it can be useful for the reader to understand ...oof obligation, which is described in the paper. This PO overrides the FIN proof obligation. Thus we will see here, how to :
  13 KB (1,755 words) - 07:19, 7 September 2010

Page text matches

• Extending the Proof Manager
  ...le for constructing proofs and maintaining existing proofs associated with proof obligations. There are two ways for extending the Proof Manager:
  3 KB (400 words) - 10:27, 27 October 2011
• Scenarios for Merging Proofs
  == Proof structure == With respect to the merging objective, a proof is made of:
  6 KB (1,046 words) - 10:34, 27 October 2011
• Generic Instantiation
  ...xtending the instantiation to a chain of refinements. We define sufficient proof obligations to ensure that the proofs associated to a generic development r ...n the instantiation. In that sense our approach avoids re-proof of pattern proof obligations in the instantiation. The reusability of a development is expre
  2 KB (232 words) - 15:23, 4 July 2013
• Proof Purger Design
  ...sed proofs by selecting projects and/or files to purge. In addition, empty proof files are also proposed for purging. Integration of the proof purger as a popup menu is achieved in the manifest through the ''org.eclips
  3 KB (505 words) - 12:54, 12 August 2009
• Proof Manager
  ...le for constructing proofs and maintaining existing proofs associated with proof obligations. Proof obligations are generated by the proof obligation generator and have the form of ''[http://handbook.cobra.cs.uni-d
  9 KB (1,478 words) - 10:33, 27 October 2011
• Proof Obligation Commands
  In this page are presented various proof obligations commands that can be run from the Event-B Explorer as follows: ...rer. The selection can be a whole project, a model (context/machine), the 'Proof Obligations' node (equivalent to selecting the corresponding model), an ele
  3 KB (457 words) - 10:43, 18 March 2010
• Refactoring Framework Release History
  ...). This renaming is not fully-functional at the moment and some discharged proof obligations may have to be discharged again. We intend to fix this problem ** Renaming of proofs would not save the proof files after renaming
  2 KB (357 words) - 12:18, 8 June 2010
• SMT Plug-in Performance
  Performance is measured by running the SMT solvers on a set of proof obligations coming from some Event-B projects. Each solver is run in the ex :contains proof obligations to test, organized in Event-B projects
  4 KB (652 words) - 08:48, 6 June 2014
• D23 Improvements to Existing Provers
  ...html One point rule], arithmetic rules), have been added to discharge more proof obligations more easily. * Reducing proof storage space.
  5 KB (789 words) - 11:41, 27 January 2010
• Modeling Feedback
  Real goal is to obtain a proof, not a model. The model is only our mean of choice to obtain a proof.
  1 KB (153 words) - 13:44, 28 October 2008
• Disprover
  or proofs for a given proof obligation. ...ult. In this cases, the absence of a counter-example will be reported as a proof.
  1 KB (155 words) - 13:34, 2 May 2016
• Revisiting Feasibility POs
  in the Proof Obligation Generator (POG) of Rodin 2.3 where one could have an event-B project containing two machines where all proof obligations are
  8 KB (1,284 words) - 18:33, 30 January 2012
• How to read Rodin projects and elements programmatically
  ==How to read Proof Obligations== For information on reading proof obligations, have a look at [[Accessing Proof Obligations]].
  3 KB (314 words) - 14:12, 30 May 2009
• Dagstuhl Seminar 2009
  * Proof automation * Proof reuse
  1 KB (150 words) - 13:31, 3 November 2009
• ADVANCE D3.2 Language extension
  ...with these additional notations, the user can also define new proof rules (proof extensions). ..., validating and using extensions while exploiting the benefits brought by proof obligations.
  4 KB (642 words) - 08:33, 29 June 2012
• Versioned Reasoners
  ...This entails potential problems: what happens if we try to reuse/replay a proof rule serialized by the old reasoner implementation ? There might be unexpec ...en trying to reuse them. Rather than adding yet another xml attribute into proof files, it has been decided to concatenate the version to the reasoner name,
  2 KB (308 words) - 17:01, 20 November 2009
• Flows
  ...as writing and maintaining deadlock-freedom and relative deadlock freedom proof obligations. Its core functionality is concerned with the verification of t ...rs and thus there will be always some delays between saving a diagram and proof status update.
  4 KB (630 words) - 22:31, 22 January 2011
• Language of an Event-B Component
  As concerns generated files (e.g., statically checked files and proof obligation files), they contain formulas in the same language as the compon Proof status files do not contain any formula and are therefore independent on th
  4 KB (692 words) - 15:06, 20 November 2013
• SMT 1.4 Performance Results
  This has led to globally improve the rate of automatically discharged proof obligations (PO), thus reducing the remaining POs to prove manually. ...provers have individually improved their rate of automatically discharged proof obligations.
  2 KB (281 words) - 15:57, 11 September 2017
• ADVANCE D3.3 Language extension
  ...with these additional notations, the user can also define new proof rules (proof extensions). ..., validating and using extensions while exploiting the benefits brought by proof obligations.
  4 KB (648 words) - 14:52, 7 October 2013

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)