Search results

From Event-B
Jump to navigationJump to search

Page title matches

  • [[Category:Design]]
    1,001 bytes (119 words) - 14:53, 21 January 2010
  • [[Category:Design]]
    3 KB (505 words) - 12:54, 12 August 2009
  • [[Category:Design]]
    2 KB (254 words) - 12:54, 12 August 2009
  • ...e elements, based on their type. In hindsight, we are taking here the same design decision we took for the event-B tools when defining the granularity of sta [[Category:Design]]
    14 KB (2,204 words) - 12:58, 12 October 2009
  • The clean separation between modelling and proving looked good during paper design. However, users reported that they were constantly switching between the t The Single View Design uses the [http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Common_Navigator_Framework Comm
    5 KB (842 words) - 18:35, 26 March 2010
  • [[Category:Design]]
    2 KB (291 words) - 09:27, 4 March 2009
  • ===Extending Single View Design=== Single View Design uses the [http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Common_Navigator_Framework Comm
    4 KB (521 words) - 18:36, 26 March 2010
  • [[Category:Design]]
    14 KB (2,104 words) - 09:40, 11 May 2009

Page text matches

  • #REDIRECT [[Proof Purger Design]]
    33 bytes (4 words) - 15:59, 6 January 2009
  • #REDIRECT [[Proof Skeleton Design]]
    35 bytes (4 words) - 16:56, 6 January 2009
  • [[Category:Design proposal]]
    415 bytes (64 words) - 10:36, 25 August 2009
  • * [[Extending Single View Design]] * [[:Category:Design proposal]]
    2 KB (179 words) - 09:17, 20 November 2013
  • A first design proposal is also drafted. === Requirements Exported by the Current Language Design ===
    3 KB (440 words) - 09:10, 1 March 2010
  • ...ng mathematical formulas. These flaws were either present in the original design of the library or were overlooked when introducing mathematical extensions. [[Category:Design proposal]]
    1 KB (179 words) - 15:34, 22 July 2012
  • ===Extending Single View Design=== Single View Design uses the [http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Common_Navigator_Framework Comm
    4 KB (521 words) - 18:36, 26 March 2010
  • ...scribe what result shall be produced by the tool. Finally, we describe the design retained for development. == Design for Improved Generation ==
    4 KB (617 words) - 09:43, 19 June 2012
  • This page describes the design of a tactic requested here : [https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?fun = Design Decision =
    5 KB (824 words) - 16:05, 18 March 2014
  • == Design Decisions == ...UI, there is the notion of an active part (i.e., view or editor). The best design is then to refresh the Rule Details and Type environment views based on the
    4 KB (683 words) - 18:33, 16 December 2011
  • ...[http://wiki.event-b.org/index.php/Image:SM%26D-KAR.pdf System Modelling & Design Using Event-B.] ===
    3 KB (351 words) - 11:30, 23 January 2014
  • [[Category:Design]]
    726 bytes (102 words) - 12:02, 12 August 2009
  • ==Design== [[Category:Design]]
    4 KB (599 words) - 15:56, 28 January 2009
  • In the original database design, file elements are hybrid as they fall in both It was found out at the end of the Rodin project, that this design decision was
    6 KB (897 words) - 11:47, 29 January 2009
  • {{see also|Undo Redo Design|l1=Undo/Redo design}} ...f Event-B]] and the corresponding [[Mathematical_Language_Evolution_Design|design]] documentation.
    6 KB (915 words) - 16:57, 27 February 2014
  • The clean separation between modelling and proving looked good during paper design. However, users reported that they were constantly switching between the t The Single View Design uses the [http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Common_Navigator_Framework Comm
    5 KB (842 words) - 18:35, 26 March 2010
  • [[Category:Design proposal]]
    851 bytes (124 words) - 12:53, 26 March 2010
  • ...(smart completion, renaming, text editing, etc), decomposition support and design-pattern management. * Choices / decisions. The decisions (e.g. design decisions) are justified.
    3 KB (399 words) - 11:20, 27 January 2010
  • ...models, for helping the development process. The objective in introducing design patterns within formal methods in general, and in Event-B in particular, is ...and management for projects of industrial size mentioned above or even the design of extension capabilities. Extension capabilities became a major concern si
    13 KB (1,991 words) - 20:57, 20 April 2012
  • ...the addition of the Generic Instantiation Plug-in (previously mentioned as Design Pattern Management). * Choices / decisions. The decisions (e.g. design decisions) are justified.
    3 KB (500 words) - 09:18, 23 April 2012
  • [[Category:Design]]
    1,001 bytes (119 words) - 14:53, 21 January 2010
  • This design document describes how this has been implemented in a better way in the cor [[Category:Design]]
    4 KB (692 words) - 15:06, 20 November 2013
  • [[Category:Design]]
    2 KB (232 words) - 15:23, 4 July 2013
  • [[Category:Design]]
    2 KB (254 words) - 12:54, 12 August 2009
  • ...://wiki.event-b.org/images/Rodin-workshop-article.pdf System Modelling and Design: Refining Software Engineering] ...fang Yuan, [http://wiki.event-b.org/images/soton-workshop.pdf Quantitative Design Decisions Measurement using Formal Method]
    5 KB (766 words) - 09:59, 21 September 2011
  • * '''AWE''' - Co-Design Architecture (CODA) ...ervices for connected embedded systems, is applying the Rodin tools to the design of software for a simple medical device. The aim is to use the evidence pro
    5 KB (718 words) - 11:40, 23 October 2015
  • * Design a subsystem for Rodin that will realize the selected scenario(s) and implem [[Category:Design proposal]]
    4 KB (670 words) - 14:38, 29 January 2009
  • === Tool Support for Design Patterns === ...mportant aspect of the Event-B method. The background theoretical work for design patterns in Event-B has been done as part of a master thesis. The objective
    10 KB (1,629 words) - 12:50, 12 August 2009
  • [[Category:Design]]
    2 KB (291 words) - 09:27, 4 March 2009
  • * [[Rodin Index Design]] * [[Proof Purger Design|Proof Purger]] allows to delete unused proofs.
    8 KB (1,260 words) - 12:45, 30 July 2015
  • ...for each tool extension and improvement are expressed. The decisions (e.g. design decision) are reported.
    2 KB (325 words) - 17:32, 29 November 2013
  • [[Category:Design]]
    2 KB (365 words) - 12:52, 12 August 2009
  • ...for each tool extension and improvement are expressed. The decisions (e.g. design decision) are related.
    2 KB (371 words) - 16:27, 13 July 2012
  • [[Category:Design proposal]]
    2 KB (335 words) - 14:16, 3 December 2010
  • This page describes the design of a tactic replacing a predicate <math> P </math> in either a hypothesis o = Design Decision =
    10 KB (1,784 words) - 16:04, 18 March 2014
  • ...in the paper [http://www.springerlink.com/content/d088h53531x7226j "Using Design Patterns in Formal Methods: An Event-B Approach"].
    6 KB (1,034 words) - 14:43, 27 January 2010
  • ...ation could also be implemented by a sequence of Prolog Queries. This is a design decision that depends on whether we want to reuse parts of the sequence or
    3 KB (325 words) - 08:20, 4 February 2009
  • for the system. It proved to be a bad design choice and it was a burden for behaviour or on the design of the railway network.
    6 KB (967 words) - 12:57, 28 October 2008
  • [[Category:Design]]
    3 KB (343 words) - 10:21, 25 November 2014
  • [[Category:Design]]
    3 KB (444 words) - 16:57, 27 February 2014
  • This page describes the design of the reasoner MembershipGoal and its associated tactic MembershipGoalTac. = Design Decision =
    19 KB (3,362 words) - 13:50, 5 June 2014
  • ...Rodin Index Design]] for more general considerations about the purpose and design. [[Category:Design]]
    10 KB (1,541 words) - 17:41, 9 March 2009
  • A first design proposal is also drafted. === Requirements Exported by the Current Language Design ===
    27 KB (3,967 words) - 13:21, 15 February 2010
  • This page describes the design of a tactic for putting a sequent in Negation Normal Form, as requested by
    3 KB (596 words) - 16:48, 13 April 2011
  • * Choices / decisions. The decisions (e.g. design decisions) are justified.
    3 KB (415 words) - 17:03, 24 November 2010
  • The major design decision concerned how to carry out the process of fine tuning. The major design decision concerned the logic in which the semantics of Event-B's logic is f
    11 KB (1,699 words) - 15:25, 27 January 2011
  • [[Category:Design]]
    3 KB (505 words) - 12:54, 12 August 2009
  • [[Category:design proposal]]
    3 KB (496 words) - 12:58, 12 August 2009
  • * Design an EMF meta model (ecore) of your extension's abstract syntax. The model sh
    6 KB (506 words) - 12:00, 25 November 2009
  • ...ion has experimented several notation and methodological alternatives. The design has now been finalised and an implementation has been achieved. State-machi ...the meta-model in as generic a manner as possible. A driving factor in the design was to support both project level tools and component level tools. The latt
    8 KB (1,224 words) - 15:53, 28 January 2010

View (previous 50 | next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)